Off camera flash experiment

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Off camera flash experiment

Postby johnd on Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:26 pm

I've been experimenting with off camera flash. 2 SB800s off camera, D200, 150mm 2.8 Sigma macro lens. I was using the 2 SB800s to get a more complex shadow effect on the flowers to give them a three dimensional feeling.

Comments and critique please.

Image Image


More here

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:39 pm

Some great experimentation out of these two I prefer the first it appears cleaner to me. The gallery has some cool shots too, are they all your own home grown flowers ?
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Yi-P on Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:59 pm

Great experiment. To me, they lack some sort of details in being a flower, saturation and colour brightness.
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby johnd on Tue Sep 19, 2006 1:19 pm

Thanks for the comments Craig and YiP.

Craig, no they are not from our garden, unfortunately. They were taken at a recent Daffodil Show in Hobart.

YiP, I've already bumped the colour saturation a little. If I take it up much more, the pinks will become reds. This is not necessarily a bad thing, but I tried to balance the reality of the actual colours with what looks good, so I didn't PP too much.

The flashes were mounted about 45 degrees down and to the left and right respectively. Being mounted low caused a bit of uneven exposure top and bottom of the flower. Next I will try mounting the flashes at flower level, but still 45 degrees out to the left and right and using a little bit of fill flash from the inbuilt d200 flash so the shadows won't be quite so harsh.

A lot of fun learning this wireless remote sb800 stuff controlled from the d200.

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue Sep 19, 2006 1:28 pm

At least your models are good at holding a pose :)
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby wendellt on Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:21 am

great work

sexy images

keep experimenting with interesting lighting concepts
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby johnd on Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:20 pm

Thanks Wendell.

I tried a similar deal at a cemetary last night. I'll check them out and post them later. 2 remote SB800s and a bit of fill from the on board d200 flash. The d200s ability to control multiple banks of remote flashes is just great. Just need another 2 or 3 SB800s. :wink:
I assume SB600s would also work in remote mode this way?

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques