



Behind the portrait shoot...Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Behind the portrait shoot...![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Without wanting to cause a fuss Leigh...
I think the behind the scenes shots have more interest in them than the actual portrait shots. How is it that Dee has substantially more character in this series of shots than in the ones being presented in the other posts? This makes me wonder then if you guys were so busy being serious for the portrait shots that you scared her quiet and so removed any chance of getting genuinely interesting shots. ![]() Regards, Paul Vandenberg
D7000 (D70S retired) - 18-70mm, 50mm F1.8, 35mm F2, Sigma 70-300mm
I'm a bit with Paul having seen these. The portrait shots are all great and show the more formal side of Dee. These images show her more off guarded side and in many ways are more interesting pic for that - but they aren't portraits which was the focus of the day. I especially like #2.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Peter isn't #2 a portrait ? It is in my book, I dont' think portraits have to be "formal" and would love to see some more relaxed and off guard moments posted if people have them.
But I've got the upper-hand here, though. She's one of my best friends. ![]() Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Craig - Yep it's a portrait, just not a formal shot like the others. I probably explained myself poorly. ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
For me, there's 2 factors involved: 1. Dee is a good friend of Leigh's, so much more likely to relax and joke around with him than with a stranger 2. Leigh is a much better photographer than I am Andrew
Thanks for that but my thought was that I'm wondering if a bunch of blokes each with 2 cameras hanging round their neck might have made her suddenly go all serious. ![]() It just seemed to me that whilst the other shots contained some very technically excellent work, they didn't capture Dee. Leigh's series in here (for me at least) shows a very different person. So... Leigh might be a better photographer and a good friend but if I hadn't seen these photos I'd have thought she was this ultra-serious girl with a fairly fixed set of poses. That said, I am aware that it was a workshop for you guys to play with lighting and such and that therefore the model may have become secondary to the setup. Regards, Paul Vandenberg
D7000 (D70S retired) - 18-70mm, 50mm F1.8, 35mm F2, Sigma 70-300mm
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|