

Girl & IronModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Girl & IronI'm beginning to go through stuff I've shot in the past few months but haven't touched. Here's two:
![]() ![]() Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
I like the pic of the girl nice pose and nice b&w, but don't really like the iron/ironing board/book.
Maybe im on the other side, I like the mystery look of the 2nd shot. The dark and light side just balances out and the barely visible items makes my want to know more whats hidden there
![]()
Leigh
Both of these are good, but #1 is by far the better of the two for it's wonderful soft lighting and the natural pose. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Leigh, love the first image...this is a good 'stock' photo and I could easily see Getty wanting something similar to this (or any stock library)...the 2nd one, well...it doesn't do much for me.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Alex, it's a combination of added grain and original noise. Here's the original:
![]() Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|