A new member

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

A new member

Postby amarkin on Wed Sep 27, 2006 11:25 am

Hi,

I have created account on this forum today; I am new to photography too. So, I am as new as they come but I am learning quickly. :)
Recently, I purchased the D50 and 18-70mm f3.5-4.5G AF-S, 85mm f/1.8D IF AF and 50mm f/1.4D AF lenses.

It'd be fantastic to read your feedbacks on my snapshots. I will welcome any of your comments: constructive critique and even a giggle. :)

My gallery is at: http://www.pbase.com/amarkin

AMarkin
Last edited by amarkin on Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
amarkin
Newbie
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:31 am
Location: SA, Australia

Postby amarkin on Wed Sep 27, 2006 11:28 am

I have taken this picture at the Royal Adelaide show
earlier this month.

Nikon D50,Nikkor 18-70mm f3.5-4.5G AF-S.

Image
amarkin
Newbie
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:31 am
Location: SA, Australia

Postby Glen on Wed Sep 27, 2006 11:29 am

Welcome Alex, hope you enjoy it here





ps none of those lenses need converting :lol: (joking)
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Geoff on Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:50 pm

Welcome Alex - wow..some nice gear to start your hobby. Look forward to having you as a long and valued member here. The vibe is great, and the people aren't bad either :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Yi-P on Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:54 pm

Welcome to the forums Alex :)

Oh wow, the 85mm f/1.4 for a starter kit :shock:

You should enjoy and learn how to use this cream-machine.
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby cawdor on Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:44 pm

Welcome to the forums Alex, quite a few nice lenses you have in your starter kit :) I gather with those F1.4 babies you do a lot of indoors shooting?
Tim
D300 | D200 | F90x | 70-200 f2.8 VR | Tamron 90 f2.8 Macro | Tokina 12-24 f4 | Sigma 18-50 f2.8 Macro | Nikon SB-800
cawdor
Member
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Postby amarkin on Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:49 pm

Yi-P wrote:Welcome to the forums Alex :)

Oh wow, the 85mm f/1.4 for a starter kit :shock:

You should enjoy and learn how to use this cream-machine.


Hi Yi-P,

I don't have 85mm F/1.4. I have 85mm F/1.8.
amarkin
Newbie
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:31 am
Location: SA, Australia

Postby Glen on Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:51 pm

Alex, you have a mistype in your first post in this thread then, that is what Yi-p was going on. I thought the same thing, nice lens to start with.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby amarkin on Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:56 pm

cawdor wrote:Welcome to the forums Alex, quite a few nice lenses you have in your starter kit :) I gather with those F1.4 babies you do a lot of indoors shooting?


That's the idea. The 50mm F/1.4D has not arrived yet.
85mm F/1.8D is great. I am using it more than 18-70mm. Most pictures in http://www.pbase.com/amarkin/street_photography were captured with this lens.


I like this one:

Image
amarkin
Newbie
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:31 am
Location: SA, Australia

Postby amarkin on Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:58 pm

Glen wrote:Alex, you have a mistype in your first post in this thread then, that is what Yi-p was going on. I thought the same thing, nice lens to start with.


Corrected :mrgreen:
amarkin
Newbie
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:31 am
Location: SA, Australia

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:56 pm

amarkin wrote:
Glen wrote:Alex, you have a mistype in your first post in this thread then, that is what Yi-p was going on. I thought the same thing, nice lens to start with.


Corrected :mrgreen:


You had a lot of people myself included feeling a little jealous with that typo, not that the 85 1.8 isn't a great lens, just the 85 1.4 is on a lot of peoples wish list, just the price makes you my wallet sore.
:lol:
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby johnd on Wed Sep 27, 2006 5:08 pm

amarkin wrote:
I like this one:



So do I Alex, that's a nice shot.

I normally prefer water flowing shots to be longer exposed to get the silky effect, but this shot works very well.
I think it's the combination of colours on the fountain and the individual water drops.
The sharp fountain/drops and soft dof effect of the background also works very well.
Now if you punched up the contrast a bit on the fountain/drops and desaturated the background a tad, I reckon you'd have a WOW shot.

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Reschsmooth on Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:41 pm

Welcome. I like the shot of the fountain as well, although you need to get the 1.4 - I can still make out the Gloria Jeans sign at the back - evil, evil, stuff.

P
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby amarkin on Wed Sep 27, 2006 8:13 pm

If many like the shot of the fountain. How about this picture? :)

Image
amarkin
Newbie
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:31 am
Location: SA, Australia

Postby amarkin on Wed Sep 27, 2006 8:24 pm

johnd wrote:
So do I Alex, that's a nice shot.

I normally prefer water flowing shots to be longer exposed to get the silky effect, but this shot works very well.
I think it's the combination of colours on the fountain and the individual water drops.
The sharp fountain/drops and soft dof effect of the background also works very well.
John


Thanks for your comments. I am planning to go at night when the lights under water are on. I will take a tripod to shoot pictures with long exposures to get interesting lightning effects.
First, I will wait when my fast 50mm F/1.4 arrives.



johnd wrote:Now if you punched up the contrast a bit on the fountain/drops and desaturated the background a tad, I reckon you'd have a WOW shot.


If I could only knew how to do this. :D
amarkin
Newbie
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:31 am
Location: SA, Australia

Postby ozimax on Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:42 pm

Nice shots here and welcome to the forum. I have photographed that fountain before in Rundle Mall. Looking forward to seeing some more stuff from you.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby johnd on Thu Sep 28, 2006 9:31 pm

amarkin wrote:
johnd wrote:Now if you punched up the contrast a bit on the fountain/drops and desaturated the background a tad, I reckon you'd have a WOW shot.


If I could only knew how to do this. :D


Photoshop is your friend. However, it'll take a lifetime to know everything about him. :wink:

Most/all image manipulation software have the capability to selectively manipulate contrast, saturation etc.

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Justin on Thu Sep 28, 2006 9:40 pm

Ok I had a play.

Done using Picasa2

I'm feeling lucky
Auto contrast
auto colour

The above three did nothing - a sign of a very well exposed picture!

On to tuning. Yanked up the fill light about 35%
Also yanked highlights and shadows respectively about 40%

on to effects

Sharpen
Saturation - dragged the slider to about 40% to tone down the reds

Wuhla!

Image
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby johnd on Thu Sep 28, 2006 9:49 pm

Print it big and frame it. That has WOW. :)
Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby amarkin on Thu Sep 28, 2006 9:58 pm

Justin wrote:Ok I had a play.


Thanks Justin!

But I think I like the original picture better. This is one is too sharp and too bright. Well, that’s how it appears on my monitor.
:)
amarkin
Newbie
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:31 am
Location: SA, Australia

Postby amarkin on Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:06 pm

I was thinking of a different method. Having two layers in the Photoshop: to de-saturate the background in the first layer and to increase the contrast of water drops in second layer, as recommended by John. Then merging two layer and voila; it may look better.

At the moment, I am learning various photography techniques and work on composures. Editing and enhancing pictures in Photoshop, well , maybe later when there's something worth editing in Photoshop.
Last edited by amarkin on Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
amarkin
Newbie
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:31 am
Location: SA, Australia

Postby Justin on Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:06 pm

Nope I agree - I've pushed it over the edge. More of an example of what you can do with some of the free tools out there.

However, I think with a tad of sharpening to bring out the water drops and some minor contrast adjustments (and a 'glow' to soften the hard edges)

Image

anyway - all good fun - and it's tough to add a lot to the photo you took.
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby amarkin on Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:18 pm

Here are few more pictures I like:

Street Musicians


Image

Image

Eucalyptus

Image
amarkin
Newbie
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:31 am
Location: SA, Australia

Postby amarkin on Tue Oct 10, 2006 11:31 pm

Nikon D50, 18-70mm F/3.5-4.5 AF, 85mm F/1.8D AF, 50mm F/1.4D AF, Zorki-4, Jupiter 8 50mm F/2.0.
amarkin
Newbie
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:31 am
Location: SA, Australia

Postby gstark on Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:55 am

AMarkin,

I have twice asked you, by PMs, to observe and respect our rules of posting here.

I see by your latest post that you still don't seem to quite understand those rules. I have amended your four most recent posts, each of which only contained just the one image, into one post, containing a link to each of those images.

To help you understand the rules, let me explain them, as clearly, the FAQ seems to have escaped your notice, despite you being referred to it twice.

THis is the "image review and critique section",: it is not the "hey, look at my images" section. If you want that, I would respectfully suggest you go elsewhere.

Unless you're showing a specific technique, there should be no more than four images in any post or thread. This is for the convenience of our members, because we've found that it's difficult to critique images when there are too many to view in the one set.

If you have more than four image, by all means, include a link to your gallery where the remainder of the images may be found.

But no more than four images in any one post or thread.

No spurious posts or cross posts. In other words, if you have four images, they should be in the one single post, not in four individual posts.

The maximum size of any dimension on any image should be no greater than 800 pixels. This is for the convenience of our members, because we've found that it's difficult to critique images when they are too big to fit within the browser window.

And the only images that you may post are those for which you hold permission. If the images are not of your own making, then you probably don't have that permission, and the best option is to post a link to the site where those images may be found.

Please now take a few moments to consider these rules, and please respect those rules, and the wishes of our membership base. You have been granted a fair bit of leniency, and I can think of no other person who has recieved, as you now have, three warnings.

Your respect is now expected.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby amarkin on Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:11 am

Hey man,

Are you always grumpy in the morning? I've never met a moody person such as yourself. I understand you have the rules here.


No need to babble in 3 paragraphs when and if I make 4 posts in a row.
Nikon D50, 18-70mm F/3.5-4.5 AF, 85mm F/1.8D AF, 50mm F/1.4D AF, Zorki-4, Jupiter 8 50mm F/2.0.
amarkin
Newbie
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:31 am
Location: SA, Australia

Postby gstark on Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:16 am

Please also see our FAQ where it discusses flaming. There are to be no personal attracks.

Is this really how you really want to conduct yourself?

Is it really that difficult to respect our rules? Rules that more than 2000 others seem to have no issues with?

Please now take immediate steps to review your conduct. I have been more than fair with you, and I have extended more than your fair share of my patience, which, in your case, has now reached its limit.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby amarkin on Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:22 am

gstark wrote:Please also see our FAQ where it discusses flaming. There are to be no personal attracks.


That's right! Who started it in public? :)
Hey, close my account and make your life easier. :)
Nikon D50, 18-70mm F/3.5-4.5 AF, 85mm F/1.8D AF, 50mm F/1.4D AF, Zorki-4, Jupiter 8 50mm F/2.0.
amarkin
Newbie
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:31 am
Location: SA, Australia

Postby gstark on Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:28 am

amarkin wrote:
gstark wrote:Please also see our FAQ where it discusses flaming. There are to be no personal attracks.


That's right! Who started it in public? :)
Hey, close my account and make your life easier. :)


Bye.

I have better things to do than deal with your infantile outbursts.

Please do not ever come back to these forums. Your attitude is unwelcome.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Yi-P on Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:36 am

Alright, he is goner now?


Not my job here, but close and lock this thread?
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques