



My 1st Digital WeddingModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
22 posts
• Page 1 of 1
My 1st Digital WeddingAs a few of you know, I took photos for a wedding a few weeks ago. Finally got a round to PP'ing a few of the photos and would love to know what you think. The photo of the Jag shows just what the day was like - between 9am and 7pm we managed a total of about 10 minutes outside. The portrait oriented photos were taken from the balcony of the B&G's honeymoon suite. It was getting dark and the wind was freezing, so we had to do the photos in short bursts, othwerwise the bride would have been the thing that was blue
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Andrew
Andrew,
Nothing wrong with these. Well done. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Andrew - you're setting a nice benchmark for yourself with these images! Well done!
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
don't see anything wrong with these mate
![]() Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
I like them all Andrew and I'm sure they will too. Well done.
Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
You managed to capture two nice natural smiles on the last one, focus and DOF are spot on. Well done!
Tim
D300 | D200 | F90x | 70-200 f2.8 VR | Tamron 90 f2.8 Macro | Tokina 12-24 f4 | Sigma 18-50 f2.8 Macro | Nikon SB-800
Andrew I've had a few looks at these before commenting since there was something about the last image that bugged me. I think it's a very fine image, but have decide it's the flower that is the problem for me as it seems out of scale (probably closer to the camera). Just an itsy bitsy little problem though.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Thanks for the constructive critique Peter and Vincent. The flowers were hard against the brides body to minimise this, but the flowers were bloody huge. That's not an optical illusion - each one of those suckers was almost as big as the bride's head. Do you think the photo would have been stronger without them in the frame at all? Also, do you think the sails from the Opera House are too out of focus?
Thanks to everyone else for your kind comments. Last edited by ABG on Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Andrew
I thought the flowers where huge of there own accord, regarding the OH sails, I didn't even realise thats what hey were, for me they images are still strong I like the nice bokeh you've achieved. Had you wanted the sails to play a bigger part in the composition I'd have used a great DOF had got a bit more detail in there.
Hi Andrew, maybe remove the flowers , I think it would have looked better ![]() I didn't even notice it was the opera house in the background ![]() Vincent
Andrew, inspired by Padey's MF shots the other day want about a square crop ? (I had a quick play)
![]() Let me know if you'd like me to remove the shot.
Previous topic • Next topic
22 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|