DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
Naomi teaches belly-dancingModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Naomi teaches belly-dancing
I can't remember if I posted this before - but I love this photo - any C&C from a non-biased viewer?
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
It's a shame we only see half of the lady to our right. This image is otherwise very nice: you have good movement, concentration, and clearly a sense of enjoyment on the faces of the subjects.
Love it. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Justin, love it. I too would prefer to see 2/3 to 3/4 of the lady on the right, absolutely perfect DOF, maybe just a tad more pp to lift the subjects from the background. Great
Yes it is a little disconcerting having her coming into the frame as she does.
I like the blur on the hand, captured by the flash. It's a little brighter in PS, I need to work on my conversion for web. EXIF (note the exposure bias, I accidentally set exposure comp...) Focal length35 mm Exposure 1/20 at f/2.8 FlashFired, return light detected Exposure bias-1/3 EV Exposure modeManual Exposure prog.Manual ISO speedISO 400 Metering modeSpot D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
Justin
I like that image...it has a nice sense of rhythm and the composition is complex but pleasing and easy to look at. Like you I am finding my images come off Pbase looking OK but seem too dark when they appear on the forum. They also seem to warm up a bit. I guess the go is to PP for effect on the forum rather than Pbase. Odd. Regards
Matt. K
This one's zenfolio but I have had inconsistent results from both zenfolio and pbase,
My theory on this (which I just made up now) is that when you display the image at anything other than the resolution you uploaded with, you are asking pbase / zenfolio to resize your image - perhaps their algorithms lose some of the 'luminance' in the photo. Hmmm I will post a test in a couple of seconds as I know this image is posted at less than original size. D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
