Tick... OR Flick!

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Tick... OR Flick!

Postby stubbsy on Mon Oct 09, 2006 8:05 pm

One image two treatments. I'd appreciate your honest feedback on both the shot and the treatment. All lens flare was skillfully created in camera. The rest is PP :wink:

Image ... Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby casnell on Mon Oct 09, 2006 8:24 pm

I like it, personally #1 does it for me...

Chris
User avatar
casnell
Member
 
Posts: 218
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 4:14 pm
Location: Heidelberg/Melbourne

Postby NJ on Mon Oct 09, 2006 8:24 pm

black and white for sure with me!
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800
http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
User avatar
NJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Ringwood, Melbourne

Postby sheepie on Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:17 pm

That treatment you've given it in B&W is magic Peter - well done ;)

That lens flare is great, a very different version of an interesting but hard to photograph building :)
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Postby Raskill on Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:22 pm

I'm going to go against the grain. Neither do much for me.

The colours in two are like an old print negative with blown highlights.

The B&W image is okay, but the lens flare needs to be cloned or tidied up in the bottom right hand corner, then the image would look better.

Sorry if I offend :wink:
2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc

http://www.awbphotos.com.au
User avatar
Raskill
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2161
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:26 pm
Location: Rockley, near Bathurst, Home of Aussie Motorsport!

Postby Oscar on Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:27 pm

Sorry Peter, in both of these I think the lens flare is overdone - neither of the shots work for me. Cheers, Mick :( :( :(
User avatar
Oscar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 11:15 am
Location: Panania, Sydney

Postby ozczecho on Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:30 am

I'm With Raskill and Oscar on this one....a little too much lens flare for my liking :( Also on my lcd the b7W looks a little flat....

But thats just my little 'ole opinion...
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby norbs on Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:21 pm

4 in a row. Neither are to your normal standard.
norbs
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 10:05 pm
Location: -30.940579 144.421865

Postby Manta on Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:39 pm

Sorry Peter - I'm going to be #5.

Not a big fan of this much flare in either treatment. Must be just an illusion but the tower in the B&W seems to be leaning to the left..
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby sheepie on Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:41 pm

Manta wrote:Not a big fan of this much flare in either treatment. Must be just an illusion but the tower in the B&W seems to be leaning to the left..

I think it had had a couple too many wines ;)

Come on guys, this is art! It took great skill for these pictures to be developed, stop being down on them! ;) :P
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Postby Manta on Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:53 pm

sheepie wrote:Come on guys, this is art! It took great skill for these pictures to be developed, stop being down on them! ;) :P


Is there a course I can do, Leon? :wink:
I'm obviously missing something!!!
Last edited by Manta on Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:20 pm

Peter - there was a famous song, ”Art for arts sake”, but unfortunately these pics are not art 8)
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby vikin70 on Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:45 pm

ouch, your critics are quite demanding eh... i like the color version...
User avatar
vikin70
Member
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 12:43 pm
Location: Cannington, Perth [d300 woopwoop]

Postby Matt. K on Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:46 pm

Peter...if, as Chris says, they are not art...therefore they anti-art, which in itself is an established form of art. If you really want to produce 'non-art' then try and produce 'art' and you may succeed. Got it?
By the way....B&W in this case wins easily. :D :D :D
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby stubbsy on Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:27 pm

Well it looks to me like the flicks are in the majority ATM.

My finger is hovering over the delete button...
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Manta on Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:45 pm

stubbsy wrote:Well it looks to me like the flicks are in the majority ATM.

My finger is hovering over the delete button...


Don't you do it!! Then I'll have to go back and rip out just about every shot I've ever posted here!!!
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby Geoff on Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:54 pm

#1 Peter - I like this a lot. I honestly don't think the flare kills it.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Oscar on Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:04 pm

10cc - art for arts sake. You try something different. If you like the result that is what counts.
User avatar
Oscar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 11:15 am
Location: Panania, Sydney

Postby MarcL on Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:13 pm

Unusual for me, I actually prefer to colour. I think the flare may be a little overdone (some of the spots look like jellyfish hovering mid-air - do you have that same recurring nightmare as me?! ;) ). Their proximity to each other says that one of them has a tilt, but that's easily "realligned".

I wouldn't flick it. Even if you accept the criticisms, you might work on it some more, or you might like it as it is...but I reckon give it a couple of months to "mature" somewhere on your disk, and then come back and look at it - that's how I decide the "flicks" (mostly, by that time, even if I don't like it, I just decide to leave it as a "scorecard" for future efforts).

So, yeah, I like the colour (jellyfish aside ;) ).

Cheers,
MarcL (who might just be "seeing jellyfish" everywhere)
MarcL
Newbie
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 4:41 pm

Postby Greg B on Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:21 pm

I like the colour version too. Very much as a matter of fact, good work.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques