


Tick... OR Flick!Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
20 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Tick... OR Flick!One image two treatments. I'd appreciate your honest feedback on both the shot and the treatment. All lens flare was skillfully created in camera. The rest is PP
![]() ![]() ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
black and white for sure with me!
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
That treatment you've given it in B&W is magic Peter - well done
![]() That lens flare is great, a very different version of an interesting but hard to photograph building ![]() *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
I'm going to go against the grain. Neither do much for me.
The colours in two are like an old print negative with blown highlights. The B&W image is okay, but the lens flare needs to be cloned or tidied up in the bottom right hand corner, then the image would look better. Sorry if I offend ![]() 2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc
http://www.awbphotos.com.au
I'm With Raskill and Oscar on this one....a little too much lens flare for my liking
![]() But thats just my little 'ole opinion...
Sorry Peter - I'm going to be #5.
Not a big fan of this much flare in either treatment. Must be just an illusion but the tower in the B&W seems to be leaning to the left.. Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
I think it had had a couple too many wines ![]() Come on guys, this is art! It took great skill for these pictures to be developed, stop being down on them! ![]() ![]() *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Is there a course I can do, Leon? ![]() I'm obviously missing something!!! Last edited by Manta on Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Peter - there was a famous song, ”Art for arts sake”, but unfortunately these pics are not art
![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Peter...if, as Chris says, they are not art...therefore they anti-art, which in itself is an established form of art. If you really want to produce 'non-art' then try and produce 'art' and you may succeed. Got it?
By the way....B&W in this case wins easily. ![]() ![]() ![]() Regards
Matt. K
Well it looks to me like the flicks are in the majority ATM.
My finger is hovering over the delete button... Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Don't you do it!! Then I'll have to go back and rip out just about every shot I've ever posted here!!! Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
#1 Peter - I like this a lot. I honestly don't think the flare kills it.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Unusual for me, I actually prefer to colour. I think the flare may be a little overdone (some of the spots look like jellyfish hovering mid-air - do you have that same recurring nightmare as me?!
![]() I wouldn't flick it. Even if you accept the criticisms, you might work on it some more, or you might like it as it is...but I reckon give it a couple of months to "mature" somewhere on your disk, and then come back and look at it - that's how I decide the "flicks" (mostly, by that time, even if I don't like it, I just decide to leave it as a "scorecard" for future efforts). So, yeah, I like the colour (jellyfish aside ![]() Cheers, MarcL (who might just be "seeing jellyfish" everywhere)
Previous topic • Next topic
20 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|