New improved? End of The World

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

New improved? End of The World

Postby johnd on Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:25 pm

The End of The World. The World is a cruise ship that was recently in Hobart on a visit.

Image Image


I've modified the original image. can I have comments of which one works best please.

Cheers
John
Last edited by johnd on Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby sheepie on Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:26 pm

hrmmm - The World has a fat bum ;)
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Postby Raskill on Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:30 pm

hehehe, very witty.

I would be tempted to clone out the little 'cling-ons' on the ass end. So to speak.

Nice shot, nice colours to.

:D
2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc

http://www.awbphotos.com.au
User avatar
Raskill
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2161
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:26 pm
Location: Rockley, near Bathurst, Home of Aussie Motorsport!

Postby blinkblink on Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:36 pm

Love it.
User avatar
blinkblink
Member
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: Romsey, Victoria

Postby Yi-P on Mon Oct 09, 2006 9:57 pm

Its a tiny little world :P
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby johnd on Mon Oct 09, 2006 10:02 pm

Raskill wrote:hehehe, very witty.

I would be tempted to clone out the little 'cling-ons' on the ass end. So to speak.

Nice shot, nice colours to.

:D


Good point. I'll do that.
Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby casnell on Mon Oct 09, 2006 10:16 pm

Raskill wrote:hehehe, very witty.

I would be tempted to clone out the little 'cling-ons' on the ass end. So to speak.

Nice shot, nice colours to.

:D

I think they're dags...

Very good shot, nice and tight.

Chris
User avatar
casnell
Member
 
Posts: 218
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 4:14 pm
Location: Heidelberg/Melbourne

Postby Rainey on Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:16 am

Nice shot! I also took a photo of this boat, but not as impressive as your shot John. I like the play on words for the title. 8)
User avatar
Rainey
Member
 
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:02 am
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

Postby adam on Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:21 am

It's a small world after-all!
When people landed on the moon, they placed a flag there - it looks like they've placed one at the end of the world too!

I like the title
---
Equipment: camera body, wide lens, standard lens, telephoto lens, flash
Wish list: skill
User avatar
adam
Senior Member
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:27 pm
Location: New Caledonia

Postby johnd on Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:58 pm

I've modified the original to remove the clingons and the ropes and give the whole image a late afternoon light feel.

Could I please have comments regarding which works best and why.

Thanks
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby blinkblink on Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:08 pm

Well John, I know who to see if I ever need a shot of my end.

Good cling-on removal. Maybe you could moonlight as a bidet. :)

I prefer the colour of the original.
User avatar
blinkblink
Member
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: Romsey, Victoria

Postby Justin on Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:43 pm

the original for me.

The second lacks contrast and the colour temperature is well boosted - the light is not qutie right. maybe a little less heat. Good job of removing the bum fluff though...
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby MattyO on Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:44 am

I like the original much better in terms of colours.

Its a nice shot, and hte title just takes the cake!
User avatar
MattyO
Member
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 7:55 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Postby Glen on Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:54 am

John prefer the colour of the original but prefer the no docking lines and bum fluff of the second
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby johnd on Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:23 pm

Thanks for the feedback guys. I'll go back and redo the original without the clingons and mooring lines. I'll darken the blue of the sky a bit as well. I might try it in b/w too, although I'm absolutely hopeless in b/w. I either end up with a washed out look or too much contrast.

Thanks
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Justin on Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:25 pm

No I like the docking lines it adds to the composition IMHO
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques