




#5
#6
#7
#8
Thanks for looking.
Edit: changed some to links.
Some recent portrait photos. (56K Warning)Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Some recent portrait photos. (56K Warning)I took these a couple of days ago, while just having lunch and going for a walk with my GF. Not a planned shoot or anything but I'm quite happy with them and I think i'm improving a bit. I'd appreciate any critique and advice. I'm really trying to get better at this photography thing, so hopefully you can help me out.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() #5 #6 #7 #8 Thanks for looking. Edit: changed some to links. Last edited by Ady on Fri Oct 13, 2006 12:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
So how did your GF approve of you taking photos of such an attractive model? ![]() ![]() ![]() Seriously, your exposures are pretty much spot-on for all your pics shown here, of that, you should be proud. Your techniqiue is certainly good in theis department. But from a personal point of view, i would have used a wider aperture to get more of that background out of focus. Remember Killakoala's rule number two of portraits. Focus on your subject and disregard everything else. ![]() Nice work though and i hope to see more as you get even better. ![]() ED: Spelling Last edited by Killakoala on Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Nice shots Ady,
I think #1 , 5 and 6 work best for me. also you should only post 4 shots in a thread, you can link to the others....
Thanks! ![]() ![]() ![]()
Thanks. I didn't realise there was a 4 photo limit. I'll edit it.
Ady,
The fourth of these is particularly nice. Did you shoot in raw or straight to jpg? I'd like to see them warmed up a notch or two; they seem a bit too cool for my liking, and I think a tickle of the wb settings might be in order. In the second image, I'd have also liked to have seen you use some fill flash here, to help counter the harsh shadows on the face. Noce work. Cheerz. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
I really like the composition of #5 #7 and #8, and please thank you GF for being such a willing model, trust me it isn't always easy to get your partner to be happy infront of the camera...
#8 - great pose, great framing with the tree behind her.
As said by others - a touch of fill flash would work well. If you are 3-4 metres away, try dialling the flash down to around -1.7 to -2.3 and then experiment from there. D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
Thanks everyone. Yes I did shoot in raw so I might have a play with the colour temp on these. I actually did use some fill flash but I might have dialled it down a little too much. I'm only using the on camera flash for now aswell so it's not so great.
Ady - I think these shots have turned out great !!!! I agree that it would have been better with a wider ap ... but you can always go back and take some more
![]() rel Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
Hi Ady,
I like your poses. I think that the time of day didn't do you any favours. Mixed lighting is the worst lighting to shoot in. Your shadows are under exposed, (her face) and where the sun is breaking through in the background, this is over exposed. I guess you could have pushed some fill flash to try and even the exposure between the highlights and shadows. Or looked for a spot that is in full shade. Or dabble with the shadows/highlights in CS. Or convert them to B&W and push the contrast +8.... Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|