I would appreciate C&C on these. Exactly the same shot, just rotated and I can't make my mind up as to which I prefer. WHich one works best, if either at all.
Cheers
DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
Anzac Bridge - to rotate or not?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Anzac Bridge - to rotate or not?
I took a walk to Anzac Bridge today to take some shots. Overcast skies turned blacker as I neared so I only stayed for a few shots in case the heaves opened and soaked me.
I would appreciate C&C on these. Exactly the same shot, just rotated and I can't make my mind up as to which I prefer. WHich one works best, if either at all.
Cheers Matt
No 1 for me Matt. The lines of the bridge seem to suit the portrait orientation much more than the landscape. I find the second shot makes me want to turn my head to look at it - a little more vertigo-inducing than the first, which seems a more natural angle to view the structure.
Nice mono conversion too!! Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
I always thought it would be better up-side down (sorry...)
#1 definitely D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
Matt
The Anzac bridge is an impressive and hard to photograph structure. You've managed to successfully capture some of the beauty you can see in person in that first shot. Definitely a keeper. Not sure about #2 Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Looks like 100% agreement, something rather unusual around here most of the time - well done!
I can't go against the tide here either Matt - stick with the impressive height of #1  - Lovely capture *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
considering both are exactly the same shot...lol
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
first one is better
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
