Page 1 of 1
Anzac Bridge - to rotate or not?
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 6:22 pmby rokkstar
I took a walk to Anzac Bridge today to take some shots. Overcast skies turned blacker as I neared so I only stayed for a few shots in case the heaves opened and soaked me.
I would appreciate C&C on these. Exactly the same shot, just rotated and I can't make my mind up as to which I prefer. WHich one works best, if either at all.
Cheers
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 6:23 pmby Alpha_7
I prefer the first one Matt, nice work!
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 6:26 pmby Ladybird
I prefer #1 as well, gives a feeling of the extreme height of the structure.
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 6:51 pmby Manta
No 1 for me Matt. The lines of the bridge seem to suit the portrait orientation much more than the landscape. I find the second shot makes me want to turn my head to look at it - a little more vertigo-inducing than the first, which seems a more natural angle to view the structure.
Nice mono conversion too!!
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 6:52 pmby Justin
I always thought it would be better up-side down (sorry...)
#1 definitely
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 8:03 pmby stubbsy
Matt
The Anzac bridge is an impressive and hard to photograph structure. You've managed to successfully capture some of the beauty you can see in person in that first shot. Definitely a keeper. Not sure about #2
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 10:44 pmby jberth1
I'm not a rotater personally !!!
Cheers
Justin
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 10:47 pmby sheepie
Looks like 100% agreement, something rather unusual around here most of the time - well done!
I can't go against the tide here either Matt - stick with the impressive height of #1
- Lovely capture
Posted:
Sun Oct 15, 2006 11:00 pmby Justin
considering both are exactly the same shot...lol
Posted:
Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:51 amby surenj
Both equally effective..Just don't show both at the same time...
Posted:
Thu Oct 19, 2006 3:06 amby PiroStitch
first one is better