Just learning PP, how are my touch ups, and adjustments?
THanks, and appreciation the first 3 words that come into your mind, for critique. This was about 30 minutes work, early days.
BEFORE - PP

AFTER - PP

Regards,
Oz
PP Skintones Before and AfterModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
25 posts
• Page 1 of 1
PP Skintones Before and AfterHi,
Just learning PP, how are my touch ups, and adjustments? THanks, and appreciation the first 3 words that come into your mind, for critique. This was about 30 minutes work, early days. BEFORE - PP ![]() AFTER - PP ![]() Regards, Oz
Looks like she has a fake tan in the second, skin tones more natural in first
Also the highlights on her cleavage draw the eye... d'oh maybe that's just me ![]() ![]() First 3 words or so Oz. D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
first one is better, probably just need to increase the brightness and it'll be fine.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Oz,
- skin tone looks too warm (along with the background). Did you play with WB ? - pink bathing suit looks overexposed or lacks detail (compared with the original) - need more images ![]() Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Oz.
What custom curves are you running in your camera? Do you have a copy of RawMagik? g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Was shooting JPEG, learning basic lighting, posing, model instruction. WB was set to camera "cloud" in place of "flash" as per my WB tests. New to curves, and no idea what RawMagik is...? More to learn.
Nope, was a dust bunny, but I thought same when I saw the images. I was scared to see it on my new Beast, but it was on the sensor, and blew off.
I adjusted Levels, and I usually push way too much, I should work with the original side by side, so I can see how much I am changing it. I'll cool it down a little, and redo it tonight. More images to follow, I want to get my adjustments better first, then batch process a group of them. I'm sure the Melbourne Workshop will help a lot with my basic learnings/areas of improvement. thanks Oz
THanks, agree, the tan color was due too much to my adjustments, so I'll take your feedback and redo tonight. No highlights added, they were as the camera found them.
I also used the Blur tool, across skin, to soften, as my technique for layer/masking and applying gaussian blur needs some time.
Any "Doctor Brown" online tutes, or shortcut tips? Only so many hours in the day ![]()
Skintones far too warm. They don't look natural. WB set to cloudy when using flash is not a good idea in my book. You should be doing a WB preset off a 18% Greycard for natural colour and then warm the tones under control in Photoshop.
Regards
Matt. K
thanks for the tips. Another quick go at it, less push on color, and levels, then using magnetic selection, then inverse selection, then applied Noise>Median, just a few pixel median.
Original ![]() Second Effort ![]()
Silly question
![]() ok, we see the images - but what were her real life colours like ? When I was way back in reproduction photography for ware house and fashion catalogues we fought for real life skin tones, which we were were mostly able to obtain from the colour slides. Well, this not be of much help to you however as you have taken these photos you may be able to compare prints or so to true skin ? All the PPed shots look a little too warm and bronzed to me. Cheers, CD
Thanks Chris. I want to shoot RAW, but my PC seems to just grind to a halt when PP, so until my RAM arrives I am stuck with this ![]() Cheers, Oz
How about this one?
Lighter pushing of color this time. As per CD's comment, her skin tones were warm to start with, with fake tan (spray type), so was warm to start with. Please C&C on this one... ![]()
Oz . I hope you don't mind .I just did a quick levels and USM on your pic . I'll remove it if you like .
Looks like your white balance is off . I find a quick way to see if your monitor or your colours are close is to do a quick auto levels on a shot first.Not the be all and end all but a quick check before a thorough PP. ![]() Tony
Atheism is a non-prophet organisation.
thanks drifter, no prob, since you are contributing to me learning, happy for you to leave it there. I just tried auto levels, and get great results, thanks for the tip!!! ![]()
Reshoot in Raw and look to something like Dx0 as an initial process. Good subject and pose for fashion photography but have to agree with colour cast problem noted above.
In the end we know Nothing, but in the meantime Learn like crazy.
Your Camera Does Matter Nikon D70 D200 D300 PPOK
Yup .
![]() 200 -Amount 0.3 -radius 0 -Threshhold You can go a bit harder on a converted raw image .The JPEG has some level of sharpening already applied in camera . Tony
Atheism is a non-prophet organisation.
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Previous topic • Next topic
25 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|