


C&C would be appreciated. Thanks
Alex
A couple from backstage at a fashion showModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A couple from backstage at a fashion show![]() ![]() ![]() C&C would be appreciated. Thanks Alex
Alex - only critique I can make on #1 and #2 is - feet. Either totally in the pic or out. In #2 (I’m having a bra week) the model on the left is showing a rather large amount of a terrible bra - let them know or take another angle
![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
#3 would be my pick.
To nitpick, the flash in the first seems abit too strong, while in #2, I think the framing is abit too tight and the pose un-model-like. Abel
Nikon d80, an ever-changing collection of cheap glass, and 0 art-sense.
first one is good in terms of idea. but she just looks like she's forcing her smile. personally I think from a shot from eye level and dialing the flash down a stop or two would have worked even better.
i don't mind the second one except the crop is a tad tight. the third one is a nice behind the scenes look ![]() Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Very nice, I like #3 for the behind the stage scene...
Would you mind sharing the lighting techniques used? ![]()
Thanks for the comments, Mick and Yi-P.
Yi-P. The lighting was ambient + remote sb800 at 10 o'clock position with respect to the subject. Flash triggered by in-built D70 flash. The technique was originated by Wendell, except I use remote due to absence of SC-29/28 cord. Hope this helps. Alex
I'm with Chris on the feet, too.
This is one of those annoying niggles I have with a lot of fashion images where the feet usually aren't in the frame for some reason or another. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Does this mean, you held the SB800 with your left hand at 10 o'clock aiming at the models? Where the flash pointed somewhere else for a bounce? Doesnt look much like a direct flash there.
Yi-P, That's right, held the flash with my left hand aiming directly at the models. Didn't bounce, just diffused with a standard diffuser. Thanks Alex
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|