Page 1 of 1
A couple from backstage at a fashion show

Posted:
Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:37 pm
by Alex
C&C would be appreciated. Thanks
Alex

Posted:
Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:43 am
by sirhc55
Alex - only critique I can make on #1 and #2 is - feet. Either totally in the pic or out. In #2 (I’m having a bra week) the
model on the left is showing a rather large amount of a terrible bra - let them know or take another angle


Posted:
Thu Oct 19, 2006 1:24 am
by asaroha
#3 would be my pick.
To nitpick, the flash in the first seems abit too strong, while in #2, I think the framing is abit too tight and the pose un-model-like.

Posted:
Thu Oct 19, 2006 3:02 am
by PiroStitch
first one is good in terms of idea. but she just looks like she's forcing her smile. personally I think from a shot from eye level and dialing the flash down a stop or two would have worked even better.
i don't mind the second one except the crop is a tad tight.
the third one is a nice behind the scenes look


Posted:
Thu Oct 19, 2006 9:07 am
by Alex
Thanks for your feedback guys.
Alex

Posted:
Thu Oct 19, 2006 9:22 am
by Oscar
My pick is #3. Captures an expected moment backstage. Well done.
I'm with Chris on the feet and also the bra in #2. And agree with the Abel on the flash.
Cheers, Mick


Posted:
Thu Oct 19, 2006 9:45 am
by Yi-P
Very nice, I like #3 for the behind the stage scene...
Would you mind sharing the lighting techniques used?


Posted:
Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:32 pm
by Alex
Thanks for the comments, Mick and Yi-P.
Yi-P. The lighting was ambient + remote sb800 at 10 o'clock position with respect to the subject. Flash triggered by in-built D70 flash. The technique was originated by Wendell, except I use remote due to absence of SC-29/28 cord.
Hope this helps.
Alex

Posted:
Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:59 pm
by Nnnnsic
I'm with Chris on the feet, too.
This is one of those annoying niggles I have with a lot of fashion images where the feet usually aren't in the frame for some reason or another.

Posted:
Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:47 pm
by Yi-P
Alex wrote:The lighting was ambient + remote sb800 at 10 o'clock position with respect to the subject. Flash triggered by in-built D70 flash. The technique was originated by Wendell, except I use remote due to absence of SC-29/28 cord.
Does this mean, you held the SB800 with your left hand at 10 o'clock aiming at the
models?
Where the flash pointed somewhere else for a bounce? Doesnt look much like a direct flash there.

Posted:
Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:05 pm
by Alex
Yi-P wrote:Alex wrote:The lighting was ambient + remote sb800 at 10 o'clock position with respect to the subject. Flash triggered by in-built D70 flash. The technique was originated by Wendell, except I use remote due to absence of SC-29/28 cord.
Does this mean, you held the SB800 with your left hand at 10 o'clock aiming at the
models?
Where the flash pointed somewhere else for a bounce? Doesnt look much like a direct flash there.
Yi-P,
That's right, held the flash with my left hand aiming directly at the
models. Didn't bounce, just diffused with a standard diffuser.
Thanks
Alex