

F-18 & F-111 about to take offModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
F-18 & F-111 about to take offA couple of shots from the airshow.
![]() ![]() http://www.gleff.com
_________________ D70, 18-70 kit , 80-400VR, 24-120VR, Sigma 10-20, SB800, Benro A328, KB-2 Ballhead
The secondThe second picture works better than the first for me. I think it is sharper and conveys more movement and speed than the first one.
Well done! I think it is amazing you are able to take these pictures without being stopped.
Great shots!! Now I regret not being able to end up in Richmond
![]() Zafra, that was from an Airshow, so you can take whatever you want to.. ![]()
What metering method did you choose, and what PP has been done besides cropping?
I like the FA-18 better of the two, even though the F-111 is my favourite of the two. I think there is a little too much detail lost in the shadows in the F-111 and the Shell awning is a little distracting. Would have been great to see them take off with full afterburner though ![]() Panning is really done well, I take it with the VR? Nice level of sharpness and focus over the entire length of the jets! Cheers,
I just used matrix metering in Programmed Auto mode at 1/80 sec shutter speed and F/14 aperture for the F111 shot. It was using an 80-400Vr lens. I would have liked some of the other shots with the afterburner but I couldn't change settings quick enough for these aircraft and they didn't turn out as good. I think spot metering would have been better for the afterburner shots and the underneaths of the aircraft, but it's always the case of realising this afterwards ![]() http://www.gleff.com
_________________ D70, 18-70 kit , 80-400VR, 24-120VR, Sigma 10-20, SB800, Benro A328, KB-2 Ballhead
I find center weighted with 8mm or 6mm selection works rather well for motorsport. Although in bright conditions with a light or highly reflective paint job I do move to spot every now and then.
Great shots. I was taking a few snaps of these at Amberly AFB a few weeks ago but couldn't get close enough to the action.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|