Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by DanielA on Sun Oct 22, 2006 3:56 pm
As Big V said we had a great turn out for the Adelaide Night meet. Here are a couple of shots my mine:
First the city at dusk:
Later the city at night:
Some non-panos. The first is a (my first) HDR and second is a two-exposure sandwich:
More shots in the gallery.
I was frustrated to later discover that all my shots from Pinky Flat onwards were shot at &$#@! ISO 1600...
Daniel
-

DanielA
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 963
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 1:23 pm
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
-
by JordanP on Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:00 pm
Daniel,
Nice series. I thing your first HDR was a winner. Some I have notice before seem quite unnatural but this one works well. The second shot with the fountain in the forground is good but I would love to see the same shot with the fountain painted with light by some means.
Thanks for sharing,
Craig
-

JordanP
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1050
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
- Location: Lismore, NSW
-
by bwhinnen on Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:11 pm
Thanks for sharing Daniel, you've also made me learn what HDR is and how it works (in the most basic sense you can achieve in one article at Luminous Landscape).
Is it an optical illusion or does the background seen through the two centre windows have a blue cast to it on the HDR image?
The others bring back memories of Adelaide though.
The fountain would have been more spectacular if it were a little higher with a light in it though in the second image.
Cheers,
-

bwhinnen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
- Location: Cornubia, Brisbane
-
by nat on Mon Oct 23, 2006 7:54 pm
Daniel,
I quite like the city skyline, but wonder how it would have looked with a little less foreground and a little more sky. I find the parklands a little dark, but love the light on the city.
The HDR looks good!!
Thanks for sharing....
-

nat
- Member
-
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:07 pm
- Location: Gawler, South Australia
by DanielA on Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:25 pm
JordanP wrote:I thing your first HDR was a winner. Some I have notice before seem quite unnatural but this one works well.
Thanks Craig. JordanP wrote:The second shot with the fountain in the forground is good but I would love to see the same shot with the fountain painted with light by some means.
It's a shame the water aerators aren't lit up. bwhinnen wrote:Thanks for sharing Daniel, you've also made me learn what HDR is and how it works (in the most basic sense you can achieve in one article at Luminous Landscape).
Thanks Brett. This was my first try at HDR and I just chucked it into the tool and then did some very simple level changes. bwhinnen wrote:Is it an optical illusion or does the background seen through the two centre windows have a blue cast to it on the HDR image?
There does appear to be a blue cast there. I think this might be due to the bright down-lights in combination with ISO 1600  nat wrote:I quite like the city skyline, but wonder how it would have looked with a little less foreground and a little more sky. I find the parklands a little dark, but love the light on the city.
Hi Nat. Yes on reflection I think that would have been better. So far I have been keeping the panos perfectly level. I'll have to try tilting them slightly.
Thank you all.
Daniel
-

DanielA
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 963
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 1:23 pm
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|