flowers, 200mm f2

shoes, 28mm f2

cake and some dancing, 10.5mm fisheye 30second exposure @ f22

3 different Fiji S3 wedding shotsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
3 different Fiji S3 wedding shotsI thought I'd post a few different wedding shots.
flowers, 200mm f2 ![]() shoes, 28mm f2 ![]() cake and some dancing, 10.5mm fisheye 30second exposure @ f22 ![]() Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
#1 has a blue cast on my monitor. Beautiful bouquet. Really love those flowers. The very original pen holding technique catches my eye as well. (Not a crit of you as the photographer or the bride...its just that I've never seen anyone else hold a pen like that)..
![]() #2 lovely comp. I'd like a little more contrast between the shoes and the surface there are on #3 doesn't work for me. cake looks like its toppling forward and the blurry stuff on the dance floor looks like... well...blurry stuff...
Love #1 & #2 Andrew. As said #1 has a blue tint (on my monitor also).
Not a fan of the last one - although the concept is good. The dancers look like ghosts in the background - not what I'd like at my wedding. ![]() Cheers, Mick ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
imho, love them all.
i'm taking notes. ![]() Simon
www.colberne.com.au I purchased a Teddy Bear this morning for the sum of $10. I named him Mohammed. This afternoon I sold him on E-Bay for $30. My question is, "Have I made a prophet?"
Exactly the same way I do - looks pretty normal to me. The photos do look good although the shoe one makes me wonder if you are trying to sell shoes - maybe it needed something stronger than the flowers to link it to a wedding (or maybe it's just me). #3 certainly looks original! I like it. Regards, Paul Vandenberg
D7000 (D70S retired) - 18-70mm, 50mm F1.8, 35mm F2, Sigma 70-300mm
Love the shoes the best. Not sure whats wrong with the way she holds the pen (thats the way I usually hold it as well
![]() ![]() I quite liked the last one, a little funky..what I dont like about it are those rings on the ceilings - they make it look like nasty flares have invaded the shot ![]()
With the last one being a long exposure, you lose that 80's feel of the ring lights in the ceiling going round and round and round.
Don't get me wrong, it was an awesome wedding with a really fantastic couple. Just the reception venue lighting is a blast from past. Something like it was out of the wedding singer. Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|