A portrait

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

A portrait

Postby Matt. K on Wed Nov 22, 2006 9:25 pm

Image
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Geoff on Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:37 pm

Nice shot Matt!
I'd be inclined to crop out the shoulder and chair on the left as you look at the image. I feel it'd have a more of an intimate feeling about it then. I wonder what he's thinking? I'm guessing he didn't enjoy having his photo taken? :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Oscar on Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:10 am

Cool shot Matt. Callum is very photogenic.
I agree with Geoff - crop out the chair and pole - maybe go for a portrait crop - removing some of the right side and clone out the bright section at the top of the wall.
Cheers, Mick :) :) :)
User avatar
Oscar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 11:15 am
Location: Panania, Sydney

Postby Matt. K on Thu Nov 23, 2006 6:40 pm

Aaah! The pole and shoulder! I think the pole adds balance and depth to the image...and the shoulder does no harm. Of course I considered a tight crop, but then the image would take on a 'mug shot' look. I often think we put in too much or we take out too much. I guess a fine balance is the aim. If an element has any visual interest and does not detract from the main subject then I am more inclined to leave it. But your comments are valid and certainly your opinions are welcomed! I am becoming more interested in the different reactions of the viewer but then there will never be a formula that will satisfy all. That's what makes the game so fascinating. :D :D
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Aussie Dave on Fri Nov 24, 2006 7:31 am

Hi Matt,
I'd have to agree with you here. Taking the photo in context, the background, pole and shoulder are all part of the scene. He wasn't sitting alone and it gives the viewer a sense of him sitting out in the courtyard with others (which I'm assuming he was doing) ?
Had it been a serious portrait shot, then I'd possibly be saying the same thing about cropping or removing some of the elements....but it's not. To me it's more of a happy snap...

My observation finds the image lacking in contrast a bit, on my work LCD monitor (uncalibrated). Not sure if others think the same ??

Nice capture though...
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby Matt. K on Fri Nov 24, 2006 8:53 am

Aussie Dave
You're making sense! :D :D :D
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Aussie Dave on Fri Nov 24, 2006 9:58 am

Matt. K wrote:Aussie Dave
You're making sense! :D :D :D


Geez...that's a first, isn't it ! :lol: :lol: :lol:
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques