From the same beach shoot I posted recently.
Here we go
Shot on provia 100f
Nikon f5

Fullsize http://www.flickr.com/photos/nicknav/311879500/
(myfave)
Back to film, baby :DModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Back to film, baby :DWoot finally got some shots processed from the roll of film I shot.
From the same beach shoot I posted recently. Here we go Shot on provia 100f Nikon f5 ![]() Fullsize http://www.flickr.com/photos/nicknav/311879500/ (myfave) ..:: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nicknav ::..
..:: http://vortsekz.info ::.. ..:: http://vorty.deviantart.com ::.. D70, 50/1.8, 18-70/3.5-4.5, TLZ2, 1GB Ultra II CF
I looks good mate, but to be 100% honest I'm not sure I can tell the difference between your earlier digital shots and this one (at least on screen they seem pretty similar).
Well they're of the same subject in similiar poses so you're not neccessarily supposed to see those differences
![]() ..:: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nicknav ::..
..:: http://vortsekz.info ::.. ..:: http://vorty.deviantart.com ::.. D70, 50/1.8, 18-70/3.5-4.5, TLZ2, 1GB Ultra II CF
Well I think its a good case for benefits of digital, if you can get the same results on either system.
Ahh. But I never intended to show that digital can look the same and i believe that fact is irrelevant because film is completely different. Just like manual is to automatic. An auto car can mostly do the same as a manual however it just isn't the same.
..:: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nicknav ::..
..:: http://vortsekz.info ::.. ..:: http://vorty.deviantart.com ::.. D70, 50/1.8, 18-70/3.5-4.5, TLZ2, 1GB Ultra II CF
Plus, your grain is real.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
This is also true :p
..:: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nicknav ::..
..:: http://vortsekz.info ::.. ..:: http://vorty.deviantart.com ::.. D70, 50/1.8, 18-70/3.5-4.5, TLZ2, 1GB Ultra II CF
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|