My favourite.

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

My favourite.

Postby Oneputt on Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:13 pm

I haven't posted this image on here before and I came across it whilst trying to find my favourite shot of 2006.

Image
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby Critter on Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:17 pm

that is a composite of two shots isn't it?
Chris
D300 | D80 | 14-24 f/2.8 | 24-70 f/2.8 | 35 f/2 | 105VR f/2.8 | 18-200VR | SB600 | R1 | GP-1 |
User avatar
Critter
Member
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:52 pm
Location: Bardon, Brisbane

Postby Oneputt on Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:28 pm

It is.
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby Kyle on Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:54 pm

Perfect :up:
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw

Postby joey on Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:06 pm

Few comments.

What is the subject on this picture? If it’s the bird, it’d be better if you created a slight angle when taking a picture and placed the bird slightly to the left of the frame – this is known as the rule of thirds – rather than having the stick and the bird sticking out of the middle. Create shallower DOF to isolate the bird from surroundings.
At greater angle, the bird will be looking in open space in front of it and there will be no dead space left behind. The stick will create a diagonal line on your image.
You can put the bird in the middle of the frame and very close but then why do you need distracting background with greater DOF? Instead, fill 80% of the frame with the image of the bird.
That way you will have more balanced image within the frame.

Here’s an example. Another participant posted his image on this forum:

http://members.westnet.com.au/stetner/D ... _Kooka.jpg

If your intent was to show spectacular background with some clouds in the sky, the horizon and red dirt then don’t put the bird so close on the frame, it distracts the view of the landscape behind. Put the bird further away, level the image of the bird with the horizon and take a picture of landscape. You will get a nicer image of the sky and landscape.

How did you get so close to the bird focal length of 24mm? I tend to agree with another respondent; this image is the composition of two other images. The composition of the picture is below average and over sharpening is unnecessary. It’d be more pleasing to view the image with rich contrast colours in mid-tone range and softer light.

That's my opinion. :)
joey
Member
 
Posts: 266
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 7:48 pm
Location: Prospect, Adelaide

Postby Oneputt on Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:37 pm

Joey read my post above. It is indeed a composite from two images. The bird was shot with the 80- 400 VR from memory at 400mm. Your other comment are noted but have nothing whatsoever to do with what I was trying to create. But thank you for your critique.
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby Oscar on Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:46 am

Hey Oneputt.

I like what you have tried to achieve here.

IMHO this piccie would look better in portrait frame with less background.

Cheers, Mick :) :) :)

edit: if only I could spelllllll!
User avatar
Oscar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 11:15 am
Location: Panania, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques