Trial Studio Lighting

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Trial Studio Lighting

Postby Oz_Beachside on Sun Dec 31, 2006 3:17 pm

The objective of this set, was to make use of a single key light, reflector for fill, and a backlight to provide graduations across a white paper backdrop. My thoughts, I would have liked to have had the backlight directly behind subject, centred, lighting upward, but I think in from the side provides an abstract perspective, and good seperation (you can just see the head at knee height in the set up shot).

I still think my WB improvements stand (as grey card was misplaced (found 10 mins after shoot)). First two softbox was overhead, and third it was camera left, fourth, camera right (I like camera right best, if the backlight is rear, and camera left (provided better balance, what do you think?)).

:evil: AUssie post and their "Picnic Holiday" meant my radio triggers from B+H are still in transit !!! So I was restricted to shorter focal lengths, using 5m cord... (yes, could have used onboard to fire heads, but is not as reliable as cord). Cant wait for radio triggers in on Tuesday!!!! :D :D

However, interested to get feedback on this selection. Find the fisheye very handy to record the lighting setup, here it is (for most of these shots).

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby Oz_Beachside on Mon Jan 01, 2007 12:41 pm

looking for comments, to improve, good, bad, ugly...?

I wanted to keep the lighting simple on these, how are they for a beginner like me?
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby DanielA on Mon Jan 01, 2007 1:15 pm

I'm surprised no one has commented on this. Bad time of year perhaps...

I am no expert and I have never done a lighting setup like this, but I know what I like. :D

Your second shot looks a little dark. The Adidas is nicely lit, but darkens further down (I'm not sure if you were going for that effect). Her face is a bit dark on her left.

I really like the arrangement of number 3. :shock: But I perhaps it is a little dark overall, or the backlight should have been less to not blow out.

The fourth looks nice, but the model looks uncomfortable with her neck like that. Nothing to do with lighting.

Number five is the pick of the crop. Very nice. 8)
I'm not sure I would change anything. If I was to suggest something it would only be to have the backlight centred behind her, instead of behind her arm.

Great setup and great shots.

Daniel
Nikon D4, D2Xs, D70, Nikkors and Sigmas lenses from 10 to 400mm
www.DSAimages.com
User avatar
DanielA
Senior Member
 
Posts: 963
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Postby Oz_Beachside on Mon Jan 01, 2007 2:44 pm

DanielA wrote:Your second shot looks a little dark. The Adidas is nicely lit, but darkens further down (I'm not sure if you were going for that effect). Her face is a bit dark on her left.


Thanks, and I agree, the lighting on this one was a softbox forward/overhead (butterfly style), so was not bright enough at hip height.
After those shots, we decided to move the light to be forward of model, rather than overhead, but learning different lighting effects, and thats what we were doing it for.

I'm not sure I would change anything. If I was to suggest something it would only be to have the backlight centred behind her, instead of behind her arm.


Agree, I have just worked out a way to set up the backlight low enough to work, so next time should be ok.

Thanks for you feedback, I appreciate it :)
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby Alex on Mon Jan 01, 2007 2:52 pm

Hi Bruce,

They all seem a little too dark on my monitor. Apart from that I think you also need to watch your white balance as the last two seem to be on the warm side. Did you shoot them RAW? If so then you can adjust exposure and white balance a bit.

Very nice attempts and keep them coming.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby xorl on Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:57 pm

I like your workspace. I wish I had a big room with a high ceiling ;).

I find the lighting on the last shot more interesting than the rest. However the background hotspot and posterisation is distracting too my eye. I'd prefer if it was a smooth subtle gradient.
Mark
User avatar
xorl
Member
 
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:07 am
Location: Sydney, NSW

Postby Oz_Beachside on Tue Jan 02, 2007 9:04 am

xorl wrote:I like your workspace. I wish I had a big room with a high ceiling ;).

I find the lighting on the last shot more interesting than the rest. However the background hotspot and posterisation is distracting too my eye. I'd prefer if it was a smooth subtle gradient.


The ceiling height is amplified by the 10.5mm fisheye :wink:

THanks, I like the lighting on the last the best too.

As for the backlight, I was using a lightstand that was about 18 inches high, i was playing with it the day after and worked out a way to use it at 2 inches high, so should be able to keep the light nice and low, bump the power down a bit, and shoot at a stop wider. Then the subject should be exposed a little nicer, and the backdrop graduations softer and more gradual (removing the hotspot).

Hope to have another shoot this week, so see how we go.
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques