Taronga Tiger

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Taronga Tiger

Postby Manta on Wed Jan 10, 2007 9:35 pm

Yet another in my "Shameless Sydney Cliches" series..

(This was shot with that awful 70-300G so it's pretty lousy - be gentle!)

Image
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby Bindii on Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:22 pm

Wow Simon....this is nice...the eye contact is captivating....at first I was going to suggest cropping out the slightly out of focus paws....but then I thought 'naaaa its good as it is'....it may have a tiny yellowy tinge to it though....although don't take my word for that as I am convinced that I need to profile my monitor....
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list... ;)
User avatar
Bindii
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: Ormeau Hills Queensland

Postby stetner on Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:35 pm

Very nice Manta. I find the reflection in the eyes a bit distracting, it kind of hides the pupils, but the sharpness is great!
User avatar
stetner
Member
 
Posts: 183
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:06 pm
Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane

Postby BBJ on Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:46 pm

Simon, as said before dont under estimate this lens i think this shot is bloody great, ok the feet are oof but that is really the only thing that i would say is a lil off putting but i can live with that but i love it.

I too have taken some great shots with this lens at times even though they are cheap, but good for the bucks.

Well done.
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40
http://www.oz-images.com
User avatar
BBJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3651
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X

Postby Matt. K on Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:02 pm

Simon
Not bad for a wonky lens. There are still some bargains to be had when buying lenses! Personally I think the image needs to be desaturated slightly. The colours are overly rich for my tastes. Looking at the image through my wine glass I can almost sense the danger!
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Steffen on Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:25 am

Wonderful image. Beautiful pose. My only niggle would be whatever it is that obscures the pupils. I agree with Matt on the "fat" colour. Maybe it's just a matter of cooling down the white balance?

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby Manta on Thu Jan 11, 2007 9:20 am

Thanks folks. The reflection was the huge glass window we mere pieces of meat were looking through. I tried getting in close and cloning it out but couldn't get it to my liking. I'll have a play with the colour - all I can put it down to was the dappled lighting in the enclosure and lots of different reflected colours in there. Bugger of a place to get decent balanced shots!

Now that I've had a good night's sleep, here's a better version (hopefully):

Image
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby blacknstormy on Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:59 am

Hey Simon - welcome home :)
Cool shot - what a handsome beast :) I prefer the second version, but the whites are appearing a bit 'blue' on my monitor ......
I'm going to have to stop using my G lens as a doorstop I think :? ;) You sure as hell get some good shots out of it :)

Hugs

Rel
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby Manta on Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:17 am

Thanks Rel. I think this shot has suffered from the effects of Smugmug hosting. Original looks great on my screen but definitely cools down on the gallery page and here. :?
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby stetner on Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:09 pm

That second one is nicer in the eyes Manta, as well, they colour looks better here, looking back, the first was slightly yellow.
User avatar
stetner
Member
 
Posts: 183
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:06 pm
Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane

Postby Steffen on Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:25 pm

I think the colour temperature is much more spot on now, but I reckon the tint needs to be shifted a little from magenta to green. Not trying to be critical for the heck of it - I just think this is an image very much worth getting right.

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby fozzie on Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:51 pm

Manta - I really like the position of the Tiger on the platform. The eyes are stll not wright. Here is a shot, most probably of the same Tiger taken last year, to illustrate the colour of the eyes for your reference:

Image


fozzie
User avatar
fozzie
Key Member
 
Posts: 2806
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pm
Location: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter

Postby Manta on Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:57 pm

CHeers Foz. I actually haven't done anything to the eyes. I think it was a trick of the bright sky reflecting directly off the interior of the glass wall right back at him. The pupils are extremely contracted - some around me were using flash (I wasn't) so that may have contributed as well.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby Steffen on Fri Jan 12, 2007 12:17 am

fozzie wrote:Here is a shot, most probably of the same Tiger taken last year, to illustrate the colour of the eyes for your reference:


Fozzie, tigers don't have blue eyes.

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques