Work, interrupted...

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Work, interrupted...

Postby the foto fanatic on Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:23 am

A still life. Variation on a familiar theme. Natural light.
Click for larger pic. :D

Image
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby Yi-P on Thu Feb 01, 2007 12:35 pm

Very nicely thought!

My only pick will be that the plastic loupe sort of spoilt the classic theme of this image.
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby the foto fanatic on Thu Feb 01, 2007 12:42 pm

Yi-P wrote:My only pick will be that the plastic loupe sort of spoilt the classic theme of this image.


Thank you - very constructive criticism. I hadn't considered that, but on reflection, I think you are right. :)

Perhaps an older-looking magnifier would better fit the theme.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby Steffen on Thu Feb 01, 2007 2:29 pm

cricketfan wrote:Perhaps an older-looking magnifier would better fit the theme.


Yes, or a pair of old-fashioned spectacles, even.

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby the foto fanatic on Thu Feb 01, 2007 4:46 pm

I have made some changes as a result of feedback.

I thought Yi-P was spot on with his comment about the plastic magnifier, so I have changed to a pair of rimless glasses. This was also a comment from Steffen.

I have done some dodging and burning as well, and found that I preferred a square format to portrait.

Any further comment?

Image
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby Mal on Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:04 pm

Much nicer with the specs, IMHO I would remove the writing at the bottom as it does not actually say anything. I can see that someone has been practicing their calligraphy. And it is nice reading what has been written up to that point :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Mal
I've got a camera, it's black. I've got some lens, they are black as well.
User avatar
Mal
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:18 pm
Location: Berowra, NSW.

Postby colin_12 on Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:20 pm

I think that the lighting is better in your second version as well Trevor.
Regards Colin
User avatar
colin_12
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Hazelbrook

Postby Oz_Beachside on Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:39 pm

Love the second. THe spec work well. Also the lighting on the gold leave in the left quarter of the image shine nicely.

And the inkpot looks like it contains ink...
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby the foto fanatic on Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:54 pm

Mal wrote:Much nicer with the specs, IMHO I would remove the writing at the bottom as it does not actually say anything. I can see that someone has been practicing their calligraphy. And it is nice reading what has been written up to that point :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Thanks Mal. I think you raise a valid point.

Thanks to others for their comments too. :)
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques