C+C always welcomed.
NeoN


Flinders IslandModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Flinders IslandTaken on a recent trip to Fliders Island.I hope you like them. Some P+P.
C+C always welcomed. NeoN ![]() ![]()
To be very honest with you I don't like the PP on either, both seem way too extreme (Is the word filter still on?) Anyways I think you've pushed them both too far and it destracts from the orginal image.. but thats just me.
I must admit I find the first one a tad overdone as well. It reminds me of an illiustrations more than a photograph, although that may well be the look you're after!!
I'm of two minds on the second. I think it almost works, a kind of eeire quality. However I think the sky spoils the effect. I suspect it's just cloud but after the processing it looks like a dirty smog, which detracrts from the idea of a landscape. I do like the foreground of it though, perhaps a crop just above the hill in the foreground? Cheers.
Much better!
1st version of geese was weird: reds were over-done and the whole thing looked like the output from a broken printer. 2nd one feels more normal, although the colours are still obviously manipulated. I think cropping the birds from the left helps. The 1st version of the grass/trees/mountain/cloud was dramatically oversharpened and as dawesy mentioned, the colour in the cloud just made it look dirty. The 2nd version is much better. The OOF grass in the foreground detracts a bit though. I used to have that problem until I got a decently-tall tripod...
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|