


Cell-LikeModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Cell-LikeShot in infrared on an old manual 55mm Micro Nikkor...
![]() ![]() ![]() Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
My fave is no.3 here Leigh and the great DOF. I also like the grainyness of no. 3 too.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Leigh, if the holographic effect is what you were after, I think it works best in #1. And very much so, the spikey thingie just pops out of the image. Interestingly only through escalation of sharpness and lightness.
Gotta try that myself one day. Cheers Steffen. lust for comfort suffocates the soul
I was actually going for that effect, Steffen. The sort of scientific photography that's seen from time to time. One of the artists who taught me at my old Uni did this sort of stuff.
Zeeps, I disagree about it being flat & dull, but the IR is done via in infrared filter (which is a bitch to shoot a macro, especially on a completely manual lens) with PP done through some custom presets I've made for various Photoshop filters. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|