Thanks for looking


A straggler from last night as well.....

Cheers
Dan
River Of LightsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
River Of LightsLol........korny i know....took this last night.
Thanks for looking ![]() ![]() A straggler from last night as well..... ![]() Cheers Dan
Wow that is incredible PP applied!!
1st one is overdone IMO... 2nd one is wowzer at an acceptable level ![]()
I don't like #1, the PP is too fake to be effective.
Number 2, the HDR works a treat, I love it. Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste. http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
As most have said the last one is stunning, and all credit to your powers of PP, and a great vanatage spot to take the originals..
With number 1, if I may suggest that maybe a more subtle gratuated blur may work on the external areas of the shot ?
Thanks guys for the advice re the first one - First of, i blurred it that much because i really hated the signs on the right they made the image look ugly - BUT - you guys are dead right.....after fresh eyes viewing it in the morning i hated it! (it often happens, whats that saying "sleep on it" well thats me)
Cheers all! Dan
i think if you only blurred the signs in the forground in the first shot it might work better, its just the blurred buildings putting me off.
thanks. Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
g'day dan,
I really like your HDR image. I am new to taking HDR images was wondering if you could please tell me how many brackerted shots did you take for develop a HDR image. Also what was your exposure interval . thanks
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|