Page 1 of 1
Decisions, decisions...

Posted:
Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:39 pm
by stubbsy

Posted:
Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:43 pm
by Mr Darcy
#2

Posted:
Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:44 pm
by colin_12
I like #1 Stubbsy.
The green grass is definately NZ.
Regards Colin

Posted:
Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:49 pm
by bwhinnen
#3 followed by #1.
But is the grass really greener on the other side


Posted:
Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:50 pm
by Tim
I like the washed out look of #2, matches the subject well


Posted:
Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:51 pm
by johnd
Peter, I prefer #3. The colours in #1 look oversaturated to me and #2 not saturated enough. There's no pleasing some people.
Cheers
John

Posted:
Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:54 pm
by Alpha_7
#3 I prefer, like John I feel that 1 is too saturated, and 2 isn't enough.

Posted:
Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:00 pm
by khalil
For some reason the 2nd one stands out to me.

Posted:
Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:25 pm
by ATJ
I think something between #1 and #2 would be perfect.

Posted:
Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:30 pm
by hart
#1

Posted:
Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:36 pm
by Yi-P
#2 and #3 with a punch of tad contrast


Posted:
Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:37 pm
by sirhc55
Surely the answer is with you - you were there to see the scene, so ipso facto, you should be able to determine what the pic should look like


Posted:
Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:44 pm
by Oz_Beachside
#3 for me, by a long shot. 1 and 2 are good in comparison. I like the say the removed color, draws the eye to the detail

Posted:
Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:09 pm
by Steffen
I like the b/w version best, it is very complimentary to the geometric nature of the subject. And the conversion you've done there is very nice.
I would definitely straighten the image, though. I personally would also center it to make it symmetrical (but that's just me).
Cheers
Steffen.

Posted:
Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:23 pm
by shutterbug
No. 1
But, maybe dial down the saturation on the grass a little bit?

Posted:
Wed Mar 14, 2007 6:57 am
by Killakoala
All of them.

Posted:
Wed Mar 14, 2007 7:26 am
by dodge
No 3 is the pick of these


Posted:
Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:08 am
by sheepie
#2, but try bumping up the green a tad. The blues in #1 are just too strong, and offputting.
#3 is great, but I personally prefer this building in colour.


Posted:
Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:56 am
by dawesy
I prefer #1, but like has been said perhaps backing off a tad on the grass would be nicer still.

Posted:
Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:06 pm
by Geoff
#3
A poll may have helped your cause here Peter


Posted:
Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:08 pm
by radar
Peter,
#3 for me as well and as mentioned earlier, I also would like to see it evenly balanced, so just trim a bit off the left.
Cheers,
André

Posted:
Wed Mar 14, 2007 1:01 pm
by stubbsy
Thank you all for your comments so far.
As for the grass in #1 - I must have spent a good 20 minutes playing with the image trying to get just that part of the shot right since it was quite yellow in the raw file. Guess I may have overdone it a little.
I also should mention that #2 had some odd processing - I used Nik Color Efex IR black and white filter on the colour image then faded the effect by about 50% to get the resultant image
#3 is a
PSCS quadtone conversion of #1 with some minor adjustments prior to the conversion to bring up the sky

Posted:
Wed Mar 14, 2007 1:14 pm
by Aussie Dave
I myself prefer number 1, however toning the saturation down a bit (as already suggested) might look better.
What do you prefer Peter ?
I'll guess....no. 3....?!?!?

Posted:
Sun Mar 18, 2007 7:54 pm
by stubbsy
Well for those who were wondering - I trully couldn't decide between #1 and #3. I'm more than happy with #3 as originally shown, but have tweaked and recropped (and cloned a little

) and below is my final version in colour
Thanks everyone for your input.
and for the trully curious - this is the original untouched image out of the camera and converted to jpeg.
