Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by losfp on Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:14 pm
Took my D200 along to my mate's wedding on the weekend. Here are a couple of shots..
First 3 are with the 70-200, last is the 18-200
First two are natural light shots in the church
I think I'm getting better, but there's still some things that I would do differently next time. Tough, tough gig. I tried to stay off to the side and stay out of the official photog's way, and I sure wouldn't want to do it for a living. Way too much pressure
The gallery with the rest of the pics is at http://thesystemisdown.com/gallery/thum ... p?album=38 if you are interested 
-

losfp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1572
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
- Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney
-
by padey on Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:28 pm
I like the third image.
The first two look out of focus or very soft.
Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
-
padey
- Member
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
- Location: Sydney, Hills Area
by losfp on Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:17 pm
Yeah, the third one is a cracker. I caught them just at the right moment in the father of the groom's speech
And yep, the first couple are pretty soft. Shoulda seen the ones I rejected  Luckily I had ISO1600, f/2.8 and VR, otherwise they would have been worse!!!!
My technique is getting better, but I still tend to stab at the shutter release when I'm trying to shoot quickly. Also, I think I could have PPed them a bit better. I've used NR, and then tried to hide the resultant softness with sharpening. In hindsight, I would have used a lot less NR, you simply don't notice the noise as much at web or 4x6 print sizes.
How's that S5 Pro going? Hell, if I was doing this wedding caper more often, I would definitely seriously consider one. I think a lot of my problems centred around trying to get around the D200's noise.
-

losfp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1572
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
- Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|