Decisions, decisions...

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Decisions, decisions...

Postby stubbsy on Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:39 pm

One image - 3 treatments and I can't decide which gives the best results. So I figure many heads are better than one... :wink:

Give me your views. Thanks.

Image



Image



Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Mr Darcy on Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:43 pm

#2
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Postby colin_12 on Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:44 pm

I like #1 Stubbsy.
The green grass is definately NZ.
Regards Colin
User avatar
colin_12
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Hazelbrook

Postby bwhinnen on Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:49 pm

#3 followed by #1.

But is the grass really greener on the other side :?:
User avatar
bwhinnen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
Location: Cornubia, Brisbane

Postby Tim on Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:50 pm

I like the washed out look of #2, matches the subject well :)
| http://www.timwhite.id.au | Nikon D40 | 18-55mm DX |
User avatar
Tim
Member
 
Posts: 101
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 12:55 pm
Location: Seaford Rise, Adelaide SA - Nikon D40

Postby johnd on Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:51 pm

Peter, I prefer #3. The colours in #1 look oversaturated to me and #2 not saturated enough. There's no pleasing some people. :wink:

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:54 pm

#3 I prefer, like John I feel that 1 is too saturated, and 2 isn't enough.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby khalil on Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:00 pm

For some reason the 2nd one stands out to me.
User avatar
khalil
Member
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 9:11 pm
Location: Sydney.

Postby ATJ on Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:25 pm

I think something between #1 and #2 would be perfect.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby hart on Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:30 pm

#1
Canon stuff|Manfrotto Stuff|Karachi Outpost|flickr|blog|Elemental Exposure
User avatar
hart
Member
 
Posts: 159
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 12:21 am
Location: Newton, Adelaide

Postby Yi-P on Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:36 pm

#2 and #3 with a punch of tad contrast :D
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:37 pm

Surely the answer is with you - you were there to see the scene, so ipso facto, you should be able to determine what the pic should look like :wink:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Oz_Beachside on Tue Mar 13, 2007 10:44 pm

#3 for me, by a long shot. 1 and 2 are good in comparison. I like the say the removed color, draws the eye to the detail
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby Steffen on Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:09 pm

I like the b/w version best, it is very complimentary to the geometric nature of the subject. And the conversion you've done there is very nice.

I would definitely straighten the image, though. I personally would also center it to make it symmetrical (but that's just me).

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby shutterbug on Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:23 pm

No. 1

But, maybe dial down the saturation on the grass a little bit?
User avatar
shutterbug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown

Postby Killakoala on Wed Mar 14, 2007 6:57 am

All of them.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby dodge on Wed Mar 14, 2007 7:26 am

No 3 is the pick of these :D
dodge
Member
 
Posts: 225
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 12:46 pm
Location: Calamvale Brisbane Qld

Postby sheepie on Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:08 am

#2, but try bumping up the green a tad. The blues in #1 are just too strong, and offputting.

#3 is great, but I personally prefer this building in colour. :)
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Postby dawesy on Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:56 am

I prefer #1, but like has been said perhaps backing off a tad on the grass would be nicer still.
dawesy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Roseville, Sydney

Postby Geoff on Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:06 pm

#3
A poll may have helped your cause here Peter :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby radar on Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:08 pm

Peter,

#3 for me as well and as mentioned earlier, I also would like to see it evenly balanced, so just trim a bit off the left.

Cheers,

André
Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams

(misc Nikon stuff)
User avatar
radar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 am
Location: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000

Postby stubbsy on Wed Mar 14, 2007 1:01 pm

Thank you all for your comments so far.

As for the grass in #1 - I must have spent a good 20 minutes playing with the image trying to get just that part of the shot right since it was quite yellow in the raw file. Guess I may have overdone it a little.

I also should mention that #2 had some odd processing - I used Nik Color Efex IR black and white filter on the colour image then faded the effect by about 50% to get the resultant image

#3 is a PSCS quadtone conversion of #1 with some minor adjustments prior to the conversion to bring up the sky
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Aussie Dave on Wed Mar 14, 2007 1:14 pm

I myself prefer number 1, however toning the saturation down a bit (as already suggested) might look better.

What do you prefer Peter ?
I'll guess....no. 3....?!?!? :lol:
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby stubbsy on Sun Mar 18, 2007 7:54 pm

Well for those who were wondering - I trully couldn't decide between #1 and #3. I'm more than happy with #3 as originally shown, but have tweaked and recropped (and cloned a little :wink: ) and below is my final version in colour

Thanks everyone for your input.

Image


and for the trully curious - this is the original untouched image out of the camera and converted to jpeg.


Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques