



A Chimp a Lioness a Parrot and an OwlModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A Chimp a Lioness a Parrot and an OwlA few more shots from the Zoo.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
These are all great Craig, but for some reason I kept going back to the first one. Maybe because it's so unusual, but I think it's my pick of the bunch.
__________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Craig
#1 is inspired. It shows you are really developing a great eye for the shot. It's particularly strong not just because the hand is so sharp and dominating in the scene, but because you've chosen an angle where there is that pool of light behind the hand to provide great contrast. I think the "humanness" of the hand really rounds things out and reminds us just how close we are in evolutionary terms to this fella. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Wonderful colour here Craig, #1 looks like a leather glove of sorts, quite an amazing crop. The parrot is excellent too. Were these taken with 70-200 VR?
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
P.S. Are you enjoying your 22" widescreen monitor?
![]() President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Craig,
All four are great images, though #4 is the weakest IMO (eye contact or with the owl's head turned more in your direction would have made for a stronger image). I agree with Stubbsy though, no. 1 is very well composed and wonderfully exposed. Bordering within that fine line of over-exposing the highlights of the fingers, yet keeping enough detail in the darker area of the palm and side of the hand....very well done ! My only query for #1 is that the blur in the background seems to have a weird sort of radial-type pattern to it. I'm assuming this was shot through glass or perspex, which is giving this illusion ?? A personal photo journey by you would be interesting to read/see. Perhaps something to consider..... ![]() Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
OziMax - Photos where taken with the 80-200 2.8 (except for the first which was D70 and 18-200VR) , I haven't yet "invested in the 70-200VR, but it's never far from the top of my list
![]() I completely agree, actually I'm pretty sure I have some others with eye contact, so I'm not sure why I chose that one to put in, other then it shows how big and bulbous the eyes on the owl are. But your right it's a poor choice. Shot through very thick glass /perspective that was actually sunlight so very challenging to shoot through.. I almost didn't get the shot due to the bustle and pushing from the crowd to get near the window. (Weekends aren't the best for Zoo trips I think). Thanks Mate, I'm definitely considering it, but I'd like to do a pretty comphrensive job, so it's a big undertaking, I've actually gone back to some of the first shots I posted here when I first joined,and its funny to see the difference.
Craig, #1 is a cracker.
The others are good too, but are pretty much standard zoo shots IMHO. Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Have to agree, 1 is the pick of this by a long long long shot! It is a brilliant capture! Well done Craig!
Thanks for the feedback, I think I got pretty luck in the first shot, and am happy with the results, as my first time shooting at the zoo, I'm really looking forward to go again, better prepared.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|