A Chimp a Lioness a Parrot and an Owl

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

A Chimp a Lioness a Parrot and an Owl

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:14 am

A few more shots from the Zoo.

Image

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby phillipb on Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:21 am

These are all great Craig, but for some reason I kept going back to the first one. Maybe because it's so unusual, but I think it's my pick of the bunch.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby dawesy on Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:16 pm

Lovin the first one. Nice take on our nearest relative and really shows the similarity of them to us with just the hand.

Nice.
dawesy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:44 pm
Location: Roseville, Sydney

Postby Glen on Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:24 pm

Craig, I also like the first one of your hand, it is like you have a $1 coin in there you are not telling Katie about.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Geoff on Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:30 pm

 ROFL Glen. 'your hand' :)

Great stuff Craig, I personally like #2 the best.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby stubbsy on Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:54 pm

Craig

#1 is inspired. It shows you are really developing a great eye for the shot. It's particularly strong not just because the hand is so sharp and dominating in the scene, but because you've chosen an angle where there is that pool of light behind the hand to provide great contrast.

I think the "humanness" of the hand really rounds things out and reminds us just how close we are in evolutionary terms to this fella.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby ozimax on Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:58 pm

Wonderful colour here Craig, #1 looks like a leather glove of sorts, quite an amazing crop. The parrot is excellent too. Were these taken with 70-200 VR?
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby ozimax on Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:59 pm

P.S. Are you enjoying your 22" widescreen monitor? :)
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby Aussie Dave on Wed Mar 14, 2007 1:09 pm

Craig,
All four are great images, though #4 is the weakest IMO (eye contact or with the owl's head turned more in your direction would have made for a stronger image).

I agree with Stubbsy though, no. 1 is very well composed and wonderfully exposed. Bordering within that fine line of over-exposing the highlights of the fingers, yet keeping enough detail in the darker area of the palm and side of the hand....very well done !

My only query for #1 is that the blur in the background seems to have a weird sort of radial-type pattern to it. I'm assuming this was shot through glass or perspex, which is giving this illusion ??

A personal photo journey by you would be interesting to read/see. Perhaps something to consider..... :wink:
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Mar 14, 2007 1:37 pm

OziMax - Photos where taken with the 80-200 2.8 (except for the first which was D70 and 18-200VR) , I haven't yet "invested in the 70-200VR, but it's never far from the top of my list :) The 22" widescreen is good, I don't like it for photo review, but the extra realestate is nice for games and for general "power browsing".

Aussie Dave wrote:Craig,
All four are great images, though #4 is the weakest IMO (eye contact or with the owl's head turned more in your direction would have made for a stronger image).
I completely agree, actually I'm pretty sure I have some others with eye contact, so I'm not sure why I chose that one to put in, other then it shows how big and bulbous the eyes on the owl are. But your right it's a poor choice.

Aussie Dave wrote:I agree with Stubbsy though, no. 1 is very well composed and wonderfully exposed. Bordering within that fine line of over-exposing the highlights of the fingers, yet keeping enough detail in the darker area of the palm and side of the hand....very well done !

My only query for #1 is that the blur in the background seems to have a weird sort of radial-type pattern to it. I'm assuming this was shot through glass or perspex, which is giving this illusion ??
Shot through very thick glass /perspective that was actually sunlight so very challenging to shoot through.. I almost didn't get the shot due to the bustle and pushing from the crowd to get near the window. (Weekends aren't the best for Zoo trips I think).
Aussie Dave wrote:A personal photo journey by you would be interesting to read/see. Perhaps something to consider..... :wink:
Thanks Mate, I'm definitely considering it, but I'd like to do a pretty comphrensive job, so it's a big undertaking, I've actually gone back to some of the first shots I posted here when I first joined,and its funny to see the difference.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby johnd on Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:28 pm

Craig, #1 is a cracker.
The others are good too, but are pretty much standard zoo shots IMHO.

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby colin_12 on Wed Mar 14, 2007 5:30 pm

Craig I agree with most that #1 is a great effort. Top shot.
Regards Colin
User avatar
colin_12
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Hazelbrook

Postby Oscar on Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:46 pm

I like them all Craig. #1 is a stunner and sort of makes the others pale away by comparison. Posted separately they all would have looked strong.
Great set of shots!

Cheers, Mick :) :) :)
User avatar
Oscar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1305
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 11:15 am
Location: Panania, Sydney

Postby Matt. K on Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:25 pm

Craig

Number one is bloody excellent! Poignant. Well done mate.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby bwhinnen on Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:26 pm

Have to agree, 1 is the pick of this by a long long long shot! It is a brilliant capture! Well done Craig!
User avatar
bwhinnen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
Location: Cornubia, Brisbane

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:44 am

Thanks for the feedback, I think I got pretty luck in the first shot, and am happy with the results, as my first time shooting at the zoo, I'm really looking forward to go again, better prepared.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques