
I'd be interested in your comments and to make it easy I've even set up a vote.
The cropped version

The uncropped version

To crop... Or notModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
To crop... Or notThis is a very problematic image for me and I've spent maybe 20 minutes playing with the cropping and now I'm all cropped out
![]() I'd be interested in your comments and to make it easy I've even set up a vote. The cropped version ![]() The uncropped version ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Peter,
I'd remove some of the sky as well. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Peter, I agree with Gary, perhaps the top 1/3 to 1/2 of the clouds. Lovely shot though!
Such a luminous colour to the ocean!
I like the layering effect with the sky and beach being seperated by the turquoiseof the ocean. I think the crop works better but I don't feel that it is a very strong image Peter. I wonder if cloning out that small rock formation on the left hand edge would create less distraction for the viewing eye? IMHO I don't think it adds all that much to the sweeping lines in the image.
Certainly it doesn't impress me like your previous work and given that high standard this one would frankly not be one I'd see you spending too much time on. cheers marco
agree with cropping the sky a bit more. Also just to make it a bit more vibrant, add a gradient layer from black to transparent and set the blending mode to overlay (in p/shop). Should bring the clouds out a bit more.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
CROP IT!
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
from those two, I prefer the foreground detail of the non crop. I have never seen a beach with such beautiful water, and black sand.
alternatively, 10% off the sky on the crop might change my mind...
Peter, just go with your gut instinct.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
i like the cropped version, draws my eyes to strengthen the backgrounds detail & depth........
uncropped tends to make me focus too much on the foreground Canon EOS 40D
Canon EOS 400D 50mm 1.8 EF
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|