



C&C welcomed.
Baby, 2 days old. C&C sought.Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Baby, 2 days old. C&C sought.Went out to see my wifes friends who have just had a bub. Got asked to take the phototaker along with me. Wasn't feeling to flash, but managed a couple of reasonable shots. Struggled with the lighting a bit though. Obviously went a bit wide and stuffed the focus a little on a few shots.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() C&C welcomed.
Norbs, I think you already know where you could have improved here, DOF-wise, particularly in #1. You can get away with a 2.8 for a shot of one person, head on, but with three people at varying distances from the lens you will need to stop it down a bit. The other issue in this photo is the way the guy's head disapears into the blown background. I'm guessing they were in front of a pretty bright window, so perhaps you could have picked a better spot.
However, #3 is fantastic because of the shallow DOF, and you've made wonderful use of available light to show the amazing texture on the baby's feet. Love the B&W conversion, also. This is a really lovely shot. I also very much like #2. Yes, the DOF is shallow and you've focussed on his little nose and mouth, but it doesn't bother me so much in this case since his eyes are closed anyway, and a little bit of softness suits a portrait of a newborn. Nicely done! Cheers, Cheers,
macka a.k.a. Kris
Yep. Points noted. Because it was in the hospital room, there was limited room and pretty hard to get good angles. Given my time again, and with a clearer head, I would have swung them around to face the window, but with a few other visitors there, I didnt want to intrude too much.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|