Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Reschsmooth on Mon Apr 16, 2007 10:51 am
I was playing around with Photomerge yesterday to see how it worked, using 3 panos that I had [very] manually created in the past, including this 3 shot pano from Kaikoura [click for larger images]:
I converted this to mono as the original was even more boring with a heavy blue cast.
and this one taken on Boxing Day last year at the McGee (about 7 shots):
I did have an 18 shot pano of Sydney harbour at night, but it didn't save for some reason.
Overall, I found the Photomerge application quite good and time saving. I notice changes in exposure are quite distinct, but can probably be managed quite well when one has the inclination
C&C appreciated.
P
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by B01NG on Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:06 pm
ooo nice, hehe yeah you can tell the exposure difference in the 2nd one, locking the exposure would have fixed that. but yeah, photomerge in PS is quite handy. 
-

B01NG
- Member
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 3:02 pm
- Location: Artarmon
by photograham on Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:25 pm
Good shots as panoramas. I have shot several using manual camera settings. I was set to process a couple a few days ago and the photoshop result was !@#*&^. A had previously been told of ArcSoft Panorama Maker, so downloaded the trial version. The same set of photos were loaded and the panorama was completed with absolutely no signs of the stiching. I have since also found out that the most experienced panorama maker at my camera club also uses this software. I am now going to but it. USD39.99 is a very readonable price for the results provided. I suggest you at least have a look.
-

photograham
- Member
-
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 5:23 pm
- Location: Pakenham, Vic
-
by Reschsmooth on Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:07 pm
Thanks for the feedback - BOING, the pano was created using jpegs as I didn't want to stretch the capabilities of the laptop via using RAW, although if I did, I could have adjusted the exposures better. I also realise that if I had opted to keep the pano as separate layers, I could have played around with curves or levels for individual sections.
CHeers
P
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|