First proper portraits

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

First proper portraits

Postby spaz on Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:10 pm

Please let me know what you think, critiques and how to improve on them would be greatly appreciated.

They were taken for a hairdresser who wanted to showcase some of her work but not only have tight, face-only shots. All taken with the 70-200 2.8 VR, large window with 2 600WS flashes bounced off the roof and wall in a large white room.

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
spaz
Member
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: St Ives, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:16 pm

All very nice shots mate, I'm not sure the facial expressions on the last do the rest of the shot justice, but overall looks like a good presentation for your clients. (The shots on my CRT, look slightly under exposed but only ever so slightly).
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby PiroStitch on Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:39 pm

The white balance is a tad warm. The concepts are certainly there.

With #2, if you have a shot without her left shoulder chopped off it would be grand :)

Hope the hair dresser loves these photos.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby wendellt on Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:48 pm

the really good thing is that you have paid attention to the background

image 1 is your best subject and background fit together and the lighting excellent

i feel though the last one the model is too close to the right side of the frame
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby spaz on Sun Apr 15, 2007 10:21 pm

Thanks for the quick replies :)

Piro, I'll have a go at correcting this. I'm not surprised it's off; I'm colour blind so until I started with photography never really paid attention to the colours of things as I knew I wasn't seeing everything.

Wendell, what criteria do you consider when deciding how the subject fits in with the background? Does it come down to "feel" somewhat, similar to composition?

For a while now I have only shot with a 50mm prime (not portraits) and I think it's helped my composition greatly. However, as pointed out with the shoulder, I've come to accept having less important elements out of frame.
User avatar
spaz
Member
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: St Ives, Sydney

Postby sky on Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:30 pm

I like the first and second shots, but agree with comments about haughty expresson for the third shot.
I'm guessing they were taken to showcase the salon's work for the national cut and colouring competitions?
I've always taken a keen interest in the pics used for these comps, as the shots of the finalists are often collated for the L'Oreal cut and colour comp finalists magazine, which the hairdressers stock and use as examples for customers to base their next style on.
Yours are as good as quality as I have seen submitted by other national hair salons, so I think you should be happy with them.
Did the client like them? Have done photos of hair models for a hairdresser before, and they are often tricky customers..!
sky
Newbie
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 4:48 pm
Location: Mt Gambier, SA

Postby wendellt on Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:58 pm

hi spaz

the criteria for background is gues is context and complimentary visual elements like tone and texture

but in your first example she has a nightie on so the bedroom scene fits
what also is great is the shapes and texture in the background are complimentary to her clothes and her wavy long hair she has so all in all the background in the first really compliments your subject

the others however have a more abstract background so considerign that tone colour and mood is more important than context
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby spaz on Mon Apr 16, 2007 5:00 pm

Sky, it's interesting that you described it as haughty. I had no idea what that meant but after looking it up, it's what I was trying to achieve. It was just the feel that I got from the lady and her overall look so tried to capture it.

The shots weren't actually for competition, she wanted to showcase how she could use the colour products of a particular company. She was very happy with my work but disappointed in the way she had prepared the models.

Thanks Wendell, I understand what you mean.
http://www.50mmprime.com

D70s | 50 1.4 | 85 1.4 | 18-70 | 70-300 ED | Pinhole | SB800

POTW 24.04.07 - thanks Geoff
User avatar
spaz
Member
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 2:28 pm
Location: St Ives, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques