I believe the first one is a little too dark, but it is hard to check with our uncalibrated monitor.


Reasonably heavy PP applied, particularly with the last one to get a slightly desaturated look.
C&C appreciated.
Cheers
Patrick
More from NZ, Mar/April 2006Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
More from NZ, Mar/April 2006Here are a couple more from our trip a year ago.
I believe the first one is a little too dark, but it is hard to check with our uncalibrated monitor. ![]() ![]() Reasonably heavy PP applied, particularly with the last one to get a slightly desaturated look. C&C appreciated. Cheers Patrick Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
I think they're both fantastic. Much better than what I had captured on my trip.
However, I have a question for those with more experience in photography. Which of these two statements makes more sense? 1) My critique is biased because I have fond memories of the subject (in this case, my honeymoon in south island, NZ). 2) My critique is fair because the images are good enough to bring back those fond memories of the subject. ??? Ben
well your hard work paid of on the 2nd
iv'e never seen nz so desaturated however in the 1st one you could put the same effort in to fix the underexposed bottom half especially the trees that would much improve it
Love the second one Patrick, absolute standout and screams middle earth to me, there might even be some hobbits in those rolling green hills.
Lovely. As has been said the first is a little dark in places, but I'm sure it's recoverable.
Thanks for the comments, guys.
Vodka - if the shots have brought back fond memories for you, just enjoy it! ![]() Wendell, with the desaturated shot, it is only the foreground which shows much difference between this result and the originally saturated photos - the mountains are almost monochrome in the original! I will try to fix the underexposure in the first one - I am not sure how to go about ensuring that I don't encounter again with the laptop - I am never sure if I am looking at the screen at the right angle to create consistency with the final print. The histogram in PS (however accurate it is) didn't really show much underexposure, but I will double check! Thanks again. P Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Love the second one. Very picturesque and reminds me of LOTR
![]() ![]() Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
So far, I have printed it out on A3 and am really happy with it. I have some special, A3+ textured paper at home which I might give it a go on, but alas, no place to hang it! P Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|