A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
Post processing to add feelingModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Post processing to add feeling
Fashion photography is where I want to be. I've noticed that in fashion, post production plays a huge role. This shot started with a vision, communicated that to the model and makeup artist. Location scouting. Then little things like filling in the shadows with a flash bounced of replica gold coated board. Then post processing to finish up. Tear it apart! 
i like what you have done, but it feels like too much of the model has been lost in the shadows
Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
since I know there is some detail in her right arm I would bring some back so that the hand isn't just floating away from her body (or at least blend out the harsh shadow line)
plus a little detail on the dark side of her face... keep the eye in shadow but a hint of cheek bone and just under the eyebrow should do it
The 2nd one is the PP'ed version right?
I personally like the first one. 
What focal length were you shooting at? her hand looks a bit dis-proportionate to the rest of her body. Its hard to tell from this small version but keep an eye on posterisation. This can happen when you over process something and it will really be evident when you get it printed at any reasonable size. Great work! J
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
