
Colour version here.

Colour version here.

Colour version here.

Colour version here.
And the a full-size crop of the lucky lenscap...

Lucky LenscapModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Lucky LenscapThe first of my Byron shots...
![]() Colour version here. ![]() Colour version here. ![]() Colour version here. ![]() Colour version here. And the a full-size crop of the lucky lenscap... ![]() Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
looks to me like she's running a Olympus E-500 with a 40-150 - the size of the lens hood would tend to indicate that to be the case, as well as what appears to be square notches on the zoom grip...
Or I could just keep wishing I was that lenscap :p
Candid. Very quick, actually. All of the photographers saw her as we walked down the beach. She was shooting the surfers, we were shooting her. So far, I know that two of the others got her out of focus... the fates must have been smiling on me that day to give me an in-focus shot and other people the out-of-focus ones.
![]() And it's a Canon. See for yourself. ![]() Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Heh, eheh.... *rubs back of head* Hmm, no idea on the lens then - just the whole profile of the camera reminded me of my old olympus. As you say, fates must have been smiling on you ![]()
Stuff the lens cap Leigh - I really like everything about these pics and the fact that you remained calm and steady whilst others had the DT’s
![]() ![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
First one is really good, and all the BW conversions are excellent
![]() It looks like a Canon 75-300 or Sigma 70-300 lens on it. My bet is more over to the Sigma, I had one of these for a while before I sold it...
From the design, it looks like the Canon equivalent of the 70-300 G. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Great shots Leigh and lovely B&W conversions. Well done.
I didn't have the DTs - it was the camera/lens - they had an auto-focus problem ![]()
Was she holding a lens?? Cheers, Mick ![]() ![]() ![]()
![]() ![]() ![]() Yes lucky you were. I have one to post also, but not nearly as good as these. Hard to pic a fave, I like them all but the three from the side I think are stronger images than the one from behind. Reflections in the sand in two and water rushing over the feet in the third make them for me, the B&W conversion works a treat on them too. I'm thinking you must have studied them hard at 100% to find that lens cap. ![]() Mark
Wetlens
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|