

thanks for looking

sk8 in melbourneModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
sk8 in melbournea couple more from the skate session with the almighty sigma 10-20. letme know what you think...
![]() ![]() thanks for looking ![]() Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
i dont like the way youve tilted the camera off horizontal. it kind of feels like you are making average tricks look a lot better?
you got a nice exposure in both shots, though. did you use any flash? i ride bmx, but know a lot of good skaters, i liked the feel of the photos, but i thought they were really cheapened by the fact that the tricks were kind of mediocre.
Nathan
I think these are good but nowhere near as good as the first group you shot. Compositionally thay are lacking something (maybe it's the strong tilt adding to that) and they aren't as arresting at first glance either. Som suggestions: #1 - are you taking a shot of the skater or the building ![]() #2 - I think all you got wrong with this one is the steep angle. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I agree with Peter that the first could of done with being close to capture more of the skater. The second one I like, the angle is steep, but it works well, all you need now are some flashes at various angles to hit them with some dynamic lighting..
I'm sure you'll continue to love the 10-20 for skate work!
thanks for the tips guys, i didnt think these were as good as the others either. i also dont like how steep i made them, i kinda got a bit excited and went overboard :LOL: im going to give it another go on thuesday. Btw, he is a good skater, but the tricks are only mediocre, and i WAS trying to make them look better
![]() something i didnt tell you though, was that these were quick digi test shots for one of my assignments (they are all done on b&w film) which is why i did the b&w conversion. i didnt tilt the assignment that much thank god ![]() Nathan
D700 | MB-D10 | Nikkor 14-24 | Nikkor 24-70 | Sigma 70-200 | 20 2.8 28 2.8 35 2 50 1.8 | Sigma 105 | SB-800 http://www.flickr.com/nathanjphoto/
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|