drying out.......

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

drying out.......

Postby big pix on Wed May 02, 2007 3:14 pm

Image
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby big pix on Thu May 03, 2007 11:26 am

I put this image on another forum and got quite a few comments .......... here 60 lookers and not a word....... I guess it is not a car, bike or female........
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby the foto fanatic on Thu May 03, 2007 11:37 am

I hadn't seen it before, BP.

But I really like it - strong composition and colour. I do think, though, that there are too many hot spots on the chillies.

Don't despair about lack of comments. Sometimes that's just the way of it. It doesn't devalue the image.

I've had similar things happen, and I would suggest most of us have.

If I think enough of one of my images to post it here, I don't really worry about lack of response. Sometimes people just enjoy a photo and don't make a comment.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby bwhinnen on Thu May 03, 2007 2:38 pm

Shhh I'm trying to enjoy the chillies!

Sorry BP, I know I don't always add comments when I see an image, alot of the time I look in passing and just admire and think I have to come back to that one. The problem is I forget to do just that, or I miss the thread when I jump back on. I think alot of people do that on here as well.

But your response has prompted me to take the time to respond!

I like the composition, I would like to see the shadow framing the whole bunch of chillies though, I think that might not look too bad. The number of highlights do detract a bit from the lower half for me. The Red is beautifully vibrant and shows the lustre of the fruit even when drying out (the stems have started to dry and lose colour in comparison)

Cheers
Brett
User avatar
bwhinnen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
Location: Cornubia, Brisbane

Postby marcotrov on Thu May 03, 2007 11:14 pm

I really like ther composition Bernie and I agree with Brett, though I find aspects of the blown highlights on parts of the chilli bunch somewhat distracting perhaps a little highlight recovery slide-fiddling in Lightroom might produce a less distracting effect yet maintaining the vibrance of the red in the chilli in tact.
Also I find the blocked shadow pattern in the top left and top right of frame slightly distracting and am left wondering if those irregular shadows where cloned out the shadow pattern behind the chillies would better frame the main subject and create better harmony in the image. Hope this makes sense Bernie and that , once again I haven't misinterpreted your intention in the creation of this fine image. :wink:
cheers
marco
Last edited by marcotrov on Thu May 03, 2007 11:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby Matt. K on Thu May 03, 2007 11:21 pm

I like the concept, the composition and love the background shadows but the chillies are too harshly lit. However, I'm a sucker for red chillies! This is a subject I'm also going to play around with.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby digitor on Thu May 03, 2007 11:38 pm

This is becoming a bit of a theme, your complaining about not getting enough response to an image you've posted.

Like the last one you complained about, I find this one unremarkable. I don't like the blown highlights, or the pedestrian composition. That's why I didn't comment before.

Cheers
What's another word for "thesaurus"?
User avatar
digitor
Senior Member
 
Posts: 925
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:53 pm
Location: Tea Tree Gully, South Australia

Postby big pix on Fri May 04, 2007 12:15 am

[quote="digitor"] complaining about not getting enough response to an image you've posted.

complaining or "stating a fact" that not only me, a lot of good images from different members that do not get comments. A lot of members with a lot less experience rely on comments to improve

"Q"-I don't like the blown highlights

Blown highlights or reflections on a very glossy surface from the lighting, which was the Sun

"Q"- the pedestrian composition

tell me how you would do the composition of the same shot ?

"Q"-That's why I didn't comment

why bother to comment at all
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby Greg B on Fri May 04, 2007 9:33 am

AHA!! I think I see why (originally) no comments now :D
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby Reschsmooth on Fri May 04, 2007 10:23 am

big pix wrote:I put this image on another forum and got quite a few comments .......... here 60 lookers and not a word.......


I have posted a number of images of late that have received zero or effectively zero responses - and yes, it can be frustrating at times. But when the forum can easily get 100+ new postings in a 12 hour period, it is easy for people to look and go past without making a comment unless the image is particularly strong or has particular critical issues [read 'flaws'] that more experienced minds can pass comment on.

Given the type of person I am, I have had a look at the number of posts/views on the IR&C thread, and, generally, it's not unreasonable to expect, on average, somewhere in the order of 1 comment for every 10 views - but this is an average, and one image can get 3 for every 10, and another 0. Stuff happens, and we just need to keep posting. At the end of the day, would you want 10 "Great image" posts or 1 "Composition could have been improved by this..., exposure could have been improved by this..., B&W conversion could have been improved by this... (you get the idea)?

P
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby Glen on Fri May 04, 2007 1:18 pm

big pix wrote:why bother to comment at all
BP, probably because you asked for them. It is hard to have it both ways, comments, but only complimentary ones. A suggestion, you could ask for positive comments only.


Reschsmooth, you are way too analytical!!
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby macka on Fri May 04, 2007 2:12 pm

While I can't speak for Digitor, I think he was venting some of the frustration felt by many members when people seem to take a lack of comments on their image personally.

Occasionally an image won't get very many comments. Sometimes you're just unlucky and the lack of comments won't necessarily reflect the quality of the image, but sometimes no comment is a form of critique in itself (albeit not a very helpful one).

If you really want a comment on an image that hasn't received (m)any, I don't think anyone would mind if give your image a friendly 'bump', but when you post with an accusatory tone inferring that your image has been deliberately ignored by the whole forum who are clearly all against you, it's no wonder you get some negative responses to that.
Cheers,

macka
a.k.a. Kris
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby Reschsmooth on Fri May 04, 2007 3:53 pm

Glen wrote:
Reschsmooth, you are way too analytical!!


Glen, I will send you my thesis as to why I don't believe I am too analytical! Backed up by research, of course. :lol:

P
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby gstark on Fri May 04, 2007 4:59 pm

macka wrote:but when you post with an accusatory tone inferring that your image has been deliberately ignored by the whole forum who are clearly all against you, it's no wonder you get some negative responses to that.


Bernie,

Macka makes a valid point here.

Glen wrote:
big pix wrote:why bother to comment at all

BP, probably because you asked for them. It is hard to have it both ways, comments, but only complimentary ones. A suggestion, you could ask for positive comments only.


So does Glen.

YOu cannot have it both ways, and when you make a post in the critiques section, it is entirely incorrect to expect only complementary posts.

It's great if that's what you get, but think about the process of criticising those who are offering their opinions when their opinions are exactly what you've asked for?

It's not logical.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques