
(Edit: Pic #1 and #2)
#1

#2

#3

#4

C+C welcomed
Fab
RAFW Fashion Week 2007Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
RAFW Fashion Week 2007Last edited by Jeko70 on Mon May 07, 2007 4:41 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Excellent runway shots. Clean and centered. No.1 is good but underexposed, I think. No. 2 the lighting concept as good, but not enough of it.
Post more. Alex
Fab
1st one is good pose is o.k but the bare feet really put off the elegance of the dress so it can be saved by re-cropping feet out the stephanie conely runway shot is spot on great work the Tina Kalivas shot is good because you got 2 models in there but when shooting blacks you need to overexpose by 1 stop or just fix the brightness in post either way all detail in her famed infra aparrel detailing has been lost in that shot and as a reult the fashin looks plain even though it wasnt. Thankyou very much for your fabulous assistance it's much appreciated and i hope you learned a thing or two post shots from Josh Goot, Nicola Fineti, Ksubi, Jessie Hill, Alex erry, Life with bird and camilla and Marc definately the highlights of Australian Fashion week, where are all those beautiful backstage reportage stuff?
Thanks,
I'll post more. First 2 are pastel/moody #1 I tryed to create a Light "Night atmosphere", dreamy/moody but not so sleepy. I think if I was exposing it at the right light I was missing my target. But you might be right. #2 I liked the eye contact.
Thanks a lot for everything! You are a legend. I'll follow your suggestion and post some shots of them. Fun is not the right word....Great, fantastic, wonderful.... ![]() Cheers
fab your welcome
you understand that fashion comes first the whole event was inspirational for Australian design I watched the news and read the papers today and theres lots of crap about skinny models and short mini shift skirts negative publicty the stuff that sells newspapers and gets ratigns on TV, it's a shame the genral public only has this narrow view of the Australian fashion indusrty but the way we saw it it was inspirational design and creativity and a lovely format, thats what i think should be publicised and celebrated
I agree at 110%!!!
They're not underexposed, but they are dark.
Fab, the second needs better curves on the face to bring her out from the darkness. Similarly, the first needs better curves on the hair so her head doesn't blend into the darkness. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Thanks, I'll follow your suggetsion! Cheers
Wendell
????......Why? Technically you should underexpose? I must be missing something Wendell. ![]() Regards
Matt. K
hi maybe i got my terminology wrong but most garmetns made out of cotton or some matte finish do not catch the light on the runway if you ecpose for the face(white) usually the image is darker and because of this the blacks on the dress loose detail hence thats why i say overexpose if you look at most runway images of black garments you will see the face is normally overexposed thats the compromise runway photographer use to get as much detail out of a black dress some nylons and latex materials catch the light
Edited #1 and #2 Any better?
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|