Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by ATJ on Sun May 06, 2007 10:55 pm
Here are a few from today:
Painted stinkfish
Hydroid
Nudibranch hanging under a ledge - I couldn't see what it was hanging on, but then my eyes are bad at close range.
Cuttlefish - This is a different species from last week. They are not as colourful, but have just as much character.
-

ATJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
- Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
-
by sirhc55 on Mon May 07, 2007 12:19 am
Pro’s
The last three are excellent
Sharp
Interesting
Colourful
Con’s
Last three - none
The first pic would have looked better if photographed against a contrasting floor but I understand that under water you do not have the choice (sometimes) 
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by Pehpsi on Mon May 07, 2007 2:18 am
Very different, very cool! 
-

Pehpsi
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1418
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:24 pm
- Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney
-
by ATJ on Mon May 07, 2007 8:11 am
Chris (and James),
Thanks for the comments.
I do agree with you on the first one from a purely photographic perspective, but I like it because it shows the fish in its natural habitat and how effective the camouflage is.
Here is a larger version of it: http://www.petsforum.com/personal/trevo ... ons07L.jpg
-

ATJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
- Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
-
by BT*ist on Mon May 07, 2007 9:12 am
I was going to say "insufficient separation of foreground and background on the first one"... but like, that's the whole point of camouflage, isn' it?
Great series. Nudibranch is my favourite.
-

BT*ist
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 8:38 am
- Location: London, United Kingdom
by Alex on Mon May 07, 2007 9:19 am
No. 3 is amazing. Love it.
Alex
-

Alex
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Nikon
-
by stubbsy on Mon May 07, 2007 10:26 am
Interesting group of shots. Like Chris, my first response to #1 was that the foreground and background merged, but as I thought about it I relaised that was the whole point of the shot. So photographically it's dull, scientifically it's great (if that makes sense). of the rest the nudibranch is the best - good DOF and colour and nice and sharp.
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by Oscar on Mon May 07, 2007 10:39 am
Cool pics Andrew.
I especially like #2 and #3.
Cheers, Mick 
-

Oscar
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1305
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 11:15 am
- Location: Panania, Sydney
by tbgphoto on Mon May 07, 2007 11:26 am
I was going to make a negative comment about #1 but the more I looked at it the more I realised that the lack of contrast with the background is what actually makes the shot.
There is nothing I can say about the others, they are spot on.
-
tbgphoto
- Member
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 3:33 pm
- Location: Broken Hill
by Matt. K on Mon May 07, 2007 8:44 pm
Nice work!
Regards
Matt. K
-

Matt. K
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
-
- Posts: 9981
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: North Nowra
by dviv on Mon May 07, 2007 9:21 pm
Great shots Andrew!
I especially like the shot of the nudibrach.
-

dviv
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:50 am
- Location: North Shore, Sydney
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|