Some honest feedback please on macro shots

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Some honest feedback please on macro shots

Postby chrisk on Sat May 12, 2007 10:53 pm

hi all, long time listener first time calelr yadda yadda...
i recently bought a second hand tamron 90mm f2.8 Di and am really enjoying a new world of macro. i have taken a heaps of shots with it and would like some C&C on these images.

i;m certainly not prescious and want to learn more about macro so suggestions are very welcome. :)

Image
Last edited by chrisk on Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Postby fishafotos on Sat May 12, 2007 11:15 pm

i love #2, it looks brilliant, perfect DOF, very sharp and great colors.
Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste.

http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
User avatar
fishafotos
Member
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:48 am
Location: East Fremantle, W.A - D80

Postby Laurie on Sat May 12, 2007 11:51 pm

the 2nd shot is great, i really like it.
great colours and so sharp.

well done and welcome to the forum! :)
User avatar
Laurie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Mortdale.Sydney/NSW.AU

Postby Alpha_7 on Sat May 12, 2007 11:59 pm

Welcome to the forum, and I look forward to more posts, as you asked honest feedback here goes (that said I have zero macro experience).


The first does do much for me, the flower itself, the focus, the DOF and also the white balance.. its a bit ho-hum for me .

#2 However is a dead set cracker, great DOF, colours, the composition , it all comes together and gels really well, and the end result its great!
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby chrisk on Sun May 13, 2007 12:07 am

thanks. :)

yeah the first looks a bit yellowy. i tried a few white balances and that was the best of them. i think i just screwed the lighting. what would you suggest for dof in that one ? or is the subject so crap its not even worth talking about ? lol
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Sun May 13, 2007 12:19 am

Well I think changing the angle may of helped, with the first. Macro shots have such shallow DOF (just a function of what they are) so if you want to get more more detail out of the shot you need the subject to line up to some extent with the focal plane of the lens. When I look at it now I think maybe the first few petals are in focus the rest of the flower isn't, change the angle a little and you could of had a bit more in focus.. (again I'm not a macro person, others would have more experience...) but I don't think the current position/composition lends itself to being a good macro shot, (personally). A better speciem certainly would help too.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Willy wombat on Sun May 13, 2007 1:58 am

The first reminds me of a crown. I certainly dont hate it but it is a little too yellow. Its good that you dont have strong shadows in this image though. Nice lighting.

Second shot is great composition. I think you are off to a great start in the wonderful world of macro.
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby chrisk on Sun May 13, 2007 11:01 am

another one. macro all of a sudden adds character to esky little bastards like flies. i call this bloke Brutus.

Image
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Postby fishafotos on Sun May 13, 2007 1:23 pm

Great shot, how did you keep still enough and get him to keep still enough to shoot that at 1/10?
Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste.

http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
User avatar
fishafotos
Member
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:48 am
Location: East Fremantle, W.A - D80

Postby chrisk on Sun May 13, 2007 6:31 pm

it's about a 60-70% crop, so i wasnt really that close.
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Postby Frankenstein on Sun May 13, 2007 6:53 pm

The first shot doesn't work for me - too much background clutter, and I'd like to see more of the centre of the flower. The 2nd one is a beauty - great combination of shapes and colour.

Frank
My photo gallery: http://www.frankalvaro.net
>>>> Nikon D300...Nikon 18-200 VR...Sigma 10-20...Tamron 90mm macro <<<<
"I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about. " Peter Griffin
User avatar
Frankenstein
Senior Member
 
Posts: 504
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 12:23 pm
Location: Ruse (Sydney)

Postby ozimax on Mon May 14, 2007 12:40 pm

Hi Rooz,

Images 2&3 are great, first a bit soft. I have heard that the Tamron 90mm Macro is a cracker lens and you have done it justice here. Looking forward to many more images.

Ozi
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques