Todd
I see you've amended your number of embedded images after being requested by Geoff to do so, but note your commentary (sticking to the rules - sorry dial uppers). I just want to make something clear. The guidelines about a maximum of four images in a post aren't JUST about those on dial up, it's also about the fact that this isn't an image gallery or vanity posting site - that's what flickr or smugmug or pbase or whatever is for. Images should be posted here for two reasons - principally for review and critique and perhaps to give a taste of a recent portfolio of shots you have on your web site.
I have as big an ego as the next person and would love to share the best of the 6,466 images from my trip to NZ last February, but I resist the urge to bore everyone shitless on the forum. For me 4 images allows me plenty of latitude to give a flavour of the work without overdoing it. If the work is good enough it will entice people to go to my SmugMug site for more.
Finally I find any more than a small number of images in a post impossible to critique and suspect others may be the same but then maybe I'm just getting old
Edit: To make sure no one misunderstands my comments above. I am not suggesting Todd is egotistical, a vanity poster or boring us shitless with his images. What I am saying is that the posting guidelines are to ensure that people who may fit into that category don't impact on our pleasure in viewing images here.