
Any comments, good or bad, will be welcome.




More here
First Wedding *eep*Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
First Wedding *eep*Pat and I were given the opportunity to shoot our first wedding on Saturday - a great experience. Stressful, but very rewarding. Already looking forward to doing it again.
![]() Any comments, good or bad, will be welcome. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() More here Last edited by macka on Thu May 17, 2007 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers,
macka a.k.a. Kris
macka,
1 & 4 are my favs are you 2 going to go into business as a wedding photographer duo? or just as a hobby? is the groom having a little grab there? or is that just my dirty mind? Last edited by Laurie on Thu May 17, 2007 3:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I like them all Macka. Is that the 85/1.8 proving it's worth again?
Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Thanks guys.
Laurie, the short answer is "we don't know". We both love photography. This weekend was great, I'd certainly like to do more. However, this year at least, Uni remains the priority for both of us. In future...who knows? ![]()
Haha, I don't think it was too serious. ![]()
Actually, it was Geoff's 50 1.4, which he kindly lent us for the event (thanks again, Geoff ![]() ![]() Last edited by macka on Thu May 17, 2007 9:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers,
macka a.k.a. Kris
Macka I dont have time to go through the gallery but i will one day, but just quickly how many other lenses did you use? did you use 2 bodies? was it a paid job or just a favour I'm-going-to-the-wedding-anyways-I-may-as-well-take-some-nice-photos sort of thing?
Cheers Laurie
Laurie, We both had two bodies - I had two D70s, Pat had a D70s and a D200. I wouldn't do a wedding without a second body. I know some people do, but I wouldn't want to. I was using a 50 1.4 on one body and the Tokina 12-24 on the other one pretty much the whole time. I also had the 85 1.8 on me. Pat mostly used the 70-200VR on one body and the Tamron 28-75 on the other, and now wishes he had used the 85 1.8 more. If we do this more often one day, it will be nice to be able to justify investing in better lenses. ![]() It was a paid job. They approached us to do it. Not complete strangers though, the groom is the brother of a close friend of mine. Cheers,
macka a.k.a. Kris
Nice light, just not enough of it ![]() Thanks for the comments everyone ![]() So join in the chorus, and sing it one and all!
Don't worry guys, you done good
![]() Ain't lighting a bitch when you're pressured for time??? #4 is my favourite, nice composition, nice lighting.
Great stuff Kris and Patrick. Like it all, only thing I would say is maybe soften the brides face in 1, just a little sharp for her skin and it may be more complimentary to have a tidge of blur there
Natural light looks good? Bit noisy but they are nicer than brightly flashed shots.
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Nice
![]() I especially like #2 ![]() I only think that the white balance in #3 should be changed so that her dress is white, assuming that it was a white dress (this is my opinion only). and would have liked to see her nose infront for #4, but it's just my thoughts and visualisation, I don't really know if it would really be better nor not. Well done, keep at it! ![]() ---
Equipment: camera body, wide lens, standard lens, telephoto lens, flash Wish list: skill
Thanks a lot for all the comments, guys. Might post a few more from the wedding at some stage.
Yeah, some people on OCAU mentioned that as well. The dress was an off-white colour. The reason that photo is sort of pinky is because it was taken just after the sun disappeared, and there was this amazing pink/orange light that only lasted for a few moments. Decided not to correct the white balance as this shows to some extent what it was actually like. Cheers, Cheers,
macka a.k.a. Kris
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|