Old Kate, New Kate

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Old Kate, New Kate

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue May 22, 2007 6:23 pm

Been making the most of the loan of the brollies, and extra lighting Kit (Thanks again Paul, your a champ!). So some of you are familar with the dark days of our office head shots in the air condition closet, well the first image shows the results plus I'll admit very very bad PP on my part. Anways what had been deemed the chimpmunk photo is a think of the past and has now been replaced the shot #2 .

The setup for the shot was shooting through a white umbrella on camera right at 1/8 and it was maybe a metre of a little more from Kate. On camera left we have a bare flash bouncing into a white wall and all a little window light spilling in from left and rear (but at the shutter speed I'd say it was offering very little). I'd tried earlier some rim lighting but Kate didn't like the affect but is pleased with this shot.

#1 Kate's old shot, ISO 200, 1/500, F9, kit lens
Image

#2 Kate's new shot, ISO 200, 1/160s, f5.3, 50 f1.4
Image
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby macka on Tue May 22, 2007 6:27 pm

Much better, Craig. That's a really nice portrait of Kate. Exposure and white balance look spot on.
Cheers,

macka
a.k.a. Kris
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby Glen on Tue May 22, 2007 6:33 pm

Very impressive Craig. Can't decide if it is the Tiffanys heart or your skills which make the second image.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Geoff on Tue May 22, 2007 6:36 pm

Sensational 2nd shot there Craig! You shoudl be really proud of that one, as should Katie! Well done buddy!!
Last edited by Geoff on Tue May 22, 2007 8:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Reschsmooth on Tue May 22, 2007 6:44 pm

Great stuff Craig - a definite improvement you should be proud of. The second shot really shows the use of light well. Well done.

P
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby big pix on Tue May 22, 2007 7:05 pm

well done Craig...... a big improvement.....
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby Matt. K on Tue May 22, 2007 7:13 pm

Nice job Craig!
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby devilla101 on Tue May 22, 2007 7:34 pm

I agree, big improvement. Nice use of lights
User avatar
devilla101
Senior Member
 
Posts: 604
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Rockdale, Sydney, Australia

Postby Paul on Tue May 22, 2007 7:58 pm

Great work Craig, A huge improvement over the original shot :)
Nikon F80D, FM2n
RRS BH-55, 055XPROB
Smugmug
User avatar
Paul
Senior Member
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 8:32 am
Location: Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia

Postby PiroStitch on Tue May 22, 2007 8:03 pm

massive improvement Craig! It's been great to see your growth. Keep it up!
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby Alex on Tue May 22, 2007 8:44 pm

Craig,

As others said, a great improvement.

I do find though that the subject blends into the dark background too much for my liking and back lighting would provide some separation. Considering your set-up it's a great result.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby sirhc55 on Tue May 22, 2007 10:08 pm

#2 is certainly an improvement Craig but keep in mind that you can use light to sculpt your subject, this gives more 3D appearance :wink:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby rooboy on Tue May 22, 2007 10:12 pm

Great work Craig :D

I'd be interested to see some of the shots with rim lighting, as I think the only thing letting the 2nd down is lack of separation from the background.
So join in the chorus, and sing it one and all!
User avatar
rooboy
Member
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:14 am
Location: Maroubra, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques