Another new and old comparison

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Another new and old comparison

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu May 24, 2007 12:49 pm

Through a lot of trial and error and playing around I think I'm starting to get some semi decent results with my temporary dual flash setup. Again I wanted to demonstrate his current head shot (another Aircondition closet era shot) vs two of the few he's considering.

The setup in for the rear flash didn't change between the two new shots, both had the SB-800 at 1/4 power close behind the subject, with the LS PJ+ Dome to provide a slightly diffused rim light.

The front flash was through a white brollie and at 1/8 or 1/4 power I tweaked as I went depending on the exact position again it was a metre to 2 metres from the subject and moved around on a arc with the centre being the subject. (if that makes sense.

Please give me plenty of feedback as I want to get as much out of having the extra kit and semi willing subjects as I can, the more I learn now the better as I'll be back to a single Sb-800 soon. What else am I missing that could make this better ?


#1 EXIF unavailable (sorry) D70
Image

#2 D200, 1/250s, ISO 160, f5
Image

#3 D200, 1/250s, ISO 160, f5
Image
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Reschsmooth on Thu May 24, 2007 12:54 pm

Craig, you have come a long way in the few days you have had the lights. The third is best as the balance between rim and main light is much better, and you have avoided the glowing ear distraction. :lol: Well done.

I wouldn't mind seeing a bit more contrast in the main lighting, although I am not sure if this would add too many unwanted shadows.

P
Regards, Patrick

Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.

Postby DaveB on Thu May 24, 2007 12:57 pm

#3 is much better than #2, but mainly just because his ear isn't glowing! BTW, #1 looks like a black background has been digitally inserted...
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby Alpha_7 on Thu May 24, 2007 12:59 pm

Thanks Patrick, I must confess the original #3 suffered very badly from glowing alien ear syndrome but after much mucking around I've made it look semi human now.. still not happy but I was pushing my PP skills to save it. Sadly the ears where something I was checking on the cameras LCD (lesson learnt).
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Alpha_7 on Fri May 25, 2007 10:40 am

I thought I'd add one more the the mix (since I can post 4).

Again please give me feedback as I want to make the most out of having the lights at my disposal.

#4 D200, ISO 160, 1/250", F5
Image
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby gstark on Fri May 25, 2007 10:48 am

Craig,

Look at #3 .... look at how the rim lighting is extending down his shoulder, providing a greater level of separation between the subject and background. This (IMHO) is probably what you should be looking to acheive.

Along with the greater subtlety of the effect in #4.

Try for a little less power (or greater flash-to-subject distance) on the rear flash, and aim more towards both shoulders and his back. If you can gain a greater spread with diffusion, so much the better.

is the rear flash positioned directly behind the subject, or off to one side?
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Alpha_7 on Fri May 25, 2007 4:13 pm

Thanks Gary your feedback was very helpful, and I see what you mean its all a balancing and next time I get someone posing for me I'll keep your advice in mind.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby stetner on Sun May 27, 2007 1:25 pm

In #3 did you photoshop the glowing ear? I see a dark area extending below and around the ear that looks like the masking is too large for the ear.....
User avatar
stetner
Member
 
Posts: 183
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:06 pm
Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane

Postby Pehpsi on Sun May 27, 2007 2:28 pm

I know nothing about portraits but 2 & 3 are excellent, lighting and clarity look very good :)
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR

20" iMac Intel C2D
Aperture 2.1
PS CS3

http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
User avatar
Pehpsi
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Sun May 27, 2007 5:16 pm

stetner wrote:In #3 did you photoshop the glowing ear? I see a dark area extending below and around the ear that looks like the masking is too large for the ear.....
Yes sloppy PP work on my side of things, I noticed when I posted but haven't fixed it yet.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques