Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by firsty on Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:06 am
Was explaining f stops and depth of field to my 11 year old son late yesterday when we were out taking photos together
...stand there and I'll show you f 2.8 V f 16
well the f 16 didn't work because of the low light and hand holding 135mm @ 1/2sec is beyond me
but I do like the the f 2.8 @ 1/60 (could be a little sharper had I bumped the ISO to help the shutter)
Angus

-

firsty
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:34 am
- Location: Baulkham Hills Sydney - D200
by Geoff on Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:16 am
Keith!!
This is a great image..
The eye contact, the sharpness (looks very sharp to me) and the OOF/DOF the DOF is excellent. Good work!!
Which lens was this shot with?
Last edited by Geoff on Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:19 am, edited 2 times in total.
-

Geoff
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
- Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.
-
by Alpha_7 on Mon Jun 04, 2007 11:17 am
Nice Bokeh and catchlights, I'm sure this is sharper then the f16 version.
Looks sharpen enough on the websized version.
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by firsty on Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:04 pm
thanks guys
this was taken with my old manual focus prime Ais 135mm 2.8
-

firsty
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:34 am
- Location: Baulkham Hills Sydney - D200
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|