Some newies!

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Some newies!

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:02 am

Image

Image

Image

Image

Cheers
dan
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney

Postby Oz_Beachside on Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:31 am

I'd like to see #1 and #4 without the "pots and pans" obscuring the view to the subject. Maybe just duck down a little. The bright white "handle" overhead is distracting from her eyes.

The suggestive pose in #4 is subtle, well, kind of.

#3, maybe just PP out that bump on her hip from underwear, just caught by the light.
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby fishafotos on Mon Jun 18, 2007 2:32 am

I can't think of any advice, they look bloody great to me. I agree with the pot and pans comment though.

Do you have any advice/links on skin smoothing etc?

Harry
Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste.

http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
User avatar
fishafotos
Member
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:48 am
Location: East Fremantle, W.A - D80

Postby shakey on Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:17 am

Overexposed bananas, too much dangly stuff from the kitchen setting and clueless use of the earpiece of a faux old fashioned phone...

well apart from that...nice... :) :) :)
User avatar
shakey
Senior Member
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: Far South Coast NSW

Postby Nnnnsic on Mon Jun 18, 2007 7:37 am

Last one is good, but the DOF drags it from being better.

Now, this might sound to be flaming from me, but don't take it to be flaming because it isn't, even though in some ways it'd be nice if you'd pay attention to either your camera's or Photoshop's histogram: do you not know what a highlight is? Because you keep killing them!

Geeze Dan... stop killing your whites. You need to be fabric softener when you're post-processing, not bleach. It's an example of someone who doesn't know how to PP when they continually make the same mistake over and over again, no offense.

I mean this especially for number 1, where it's way too glossy and overblown. From the way the colour seems over harsh in number 3, you'd be doing it there too if she were wearing white.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:01 am

Nnnnsic wrote:Last one is good, but the DOF drags it from being better.

Now, this might sound to be flaming from me, but don't take it to be flaming because it isn't, even though in some ways it'd be nice if you'd pay attention to either your camera's or Photoshop's histogram: do you not know what a highlight is? Because you keep killing them!

Geeze Dan... stop killing your whites. You need to be fabric softener when you're post-processing, not bleach. It's an example of someone who doesn't know how to PP when they continually make the same mistake over and over again, no offense.

I mean this especially for number 1, where it's way too glossy and overblown. From the way the colour seems over harsh in number 3, you'd be doing it there too if she were wearing white.


Thanks Leigh...i do actually like to keep my highlights bright, but maybe i am over doing it, i just hate a plain boring (static) image. I will keep plowing on, nothing i ever take will be technically correct anyhow (as i am technically crap and rely to much on post to save images) so thanks for the tips,

Dan
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney

Postby jamesw on Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:39 am

yep highlights are way overblown.

forget pp learn how to use that camera bro :wink: using a camera is much more fun than a mouse :lol: :lol:
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide

Postby jamesw on Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:42 am

Cre8tivepixels wrote: I will keep plowing on, nothing i ever take will be technically correct anyhow (as i am technically crap and rely to much on post to save images)


i just noticed your sig...

“pessimism is a self fulfilling prophecy"

perhaps taking your own advice???? :P
body: nikon d200, d70s, f4s, f601.
lens:nikon 35-70mm f2.8, 70-300mm f4-5.6, 10.5mm f2.8, 20mm f2.8, 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8.
flash: nikon sb600, sunpak 383 (x1), sunpak 555 (x4), pocketwizard plus II (x4)
jamesdwade.com
dishonourclothing.com
User avatar
jamesw
Senior Member
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: norwood, adelaide


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques