Lovin my new 17-35mm Nikon!

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Lovin my new 17-35mm Nikon!

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:53 am

Thanks for checking these out.....juts got my new 17-35mm WOW so much sharper than that dud they call the 17-55mm..........i cant believe the difference!

Here are some i took yesterday......


Image

Image

Image

Image

Cheers
dan
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney

Postby Laurie on Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:12 am

Dan fantastic as always.
though the last one could of done with a higher f/stop as her bottom half is a little soft.
well done, and to be honest, i like seeing different models :D
User avatar
Laurie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Mortdale.Sydney/NSW.AU

Postby wendellt on Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:18 am

very creative work especially like the mask concept
as a whole image i think the 3rd one works best

the 17-35 is the best
Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents
Press - Getty Images
Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency
My Book - Zeduce
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:38 am

wendellt wrote:the 17-35 is the best


You bet it is....the whole reason i got it was after seeing your images and hoping (wrongly i might add) :wink: that i could take images like you....BUT i was really surprised just how much sharper it was, i don't know maybe i had a dud 17-55, i heard there were a few around....thanks for the comments!
Dan
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney

Postby wendellt on Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:19 pm

nah 17-35 is the best

somehow the 1.5 crop factor uses the best circle of the lens on the 17-35

something i read in a tech paper

loved it more than my 28-70
Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents
Press - Getty Images
Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency
My Book - Zeduce
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby Oz_Beachside on Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:01 pm

nice shots. I didnt want to read this, as I sometimes find the 28-70 too close, and I like the perspective change closer to 17mm.

Nice as always Dan!
User avatar
Oz_Beachside
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2227
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200

Postby marcotrov on Sun Jun 24, 2007 11:23 am

Terrific work Dan. You are really using the qualities of 17-35 very well. I agree guys, I love my 17-35 it's a ripper. It also fit in nicely with my efforts to maintain full frame integrity, or at least give me that option if ever Nikon decide to go that way, not that i see anything wrong with the DX alternative :) But it's good to have the optional choice. So I have 12-24 F/4 (the only DX lens in my arsenal), 17-35, 35-70 F/2.8, 70-200VR, 80-400VR.
I do notice however that the 17-35 can be unforgiving on poor technique, certainly in combination with the high res of the D200.
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby Nnnnsic on Sun Jun 24, 2007 12:27 pm

Good compositions, but one of these days you're going to have to learn not to lose your shadows and your highlights to all buggery.

Shall we demonstrate?

Number 1 has her hair fading into each part. It doesn't take much PP work to bring that out. I'm going to assume you don't know how or that you're not very good at post but all it takes is a bit of patience, feathering, and curves Dan.

Number 2... there go those highlights again. I can assume her right breast (left to us) isn't supposed to be radiating light?

Number 3... so her black bra is made out of the darkest, most evil, and stealthiest technology known to man kind... not if you look at the straps it ain't.

Number 4 is your best. I have nothing to say about it colour wise, but I'd stop making your models lose so much skin composition. They seem plasticy.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby Cre8tivepixels on Sun Jun 24, 2007 1:38 pm

Thanks guys for the feedback..... :)
User avatar
Cre8tivepixels
Senior Member
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Malabar - Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques