Here are some i took yesterday......




Cheers
dan
Lovin my new 17-35mm Nikon!Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Lovin my new 17-35mm Nikon!Thanks for checking these out.....juts got my new 17-35mm WOW so much sharper than that dud they call the 17-55mm..........i cant believe the difference!
Here are some i took yesterday...... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Cheers dan
very creative work especially like the mask concept
as a whole image i think the 3rd one works best the 17-35 is the best Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents Press - Getty Images Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency My Book - Zeduce
You bet it is....the whole reason i got it was after seeing your images and hoping (wrongly i might add) ![]() Dan
nah 17-35 is the best
somehow the 1.5 crop factor uses the best circle of the lens on the 17-35 something i read in a tech paper loved it more than my 28-70 Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents Press - Getty Images Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency My Book - Zeduce
nice shots. I didnt want to read this, as I sometimes find the 28-70 too close, and I like the perspective change closer to 17mm.
Nice as always Dan!
Terrific work Dan. You are really using the qualities of 17-35 very well. I agree guys, I love my 17-35 it's a ripper. It also fit in nicely with my efforts to maintain full frame integrity, or at least give me that option if ever Nikon decide to go that way, not that i see anything wrong with the DX alternative
![]() I do notice however that the 17-35 can be unforgiving on poor technique, certainly in combination with the high res of the D200. cheers marco
Good compositions, but one of these days you're going to have to learn not to lose your shadows and your highlights to all buggery.
Shall we demonstrate? Number 1 has her hair fading into each part. It doesn't take much PP work to bring that out. I'm going to assume you don't know how or that you're not very good at post but all it takes is a bit of patience, feathering, and curves Dan. Number 2... there go those highlights again. I can assume her right breast (left to us) isn't supposed to be radiating light? Number 3... so her black bra is made out of the darkest, most evil, and stealthiest technology known to man kind... not if you look at the straps it ain't. Number 4 is your best. I have nothing to say about it colour wise, but I'd stop making your models lose so much skin composition. They seem plasticy. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|