Page 1 of 1

Lovin my new 17-35mm Nikon!

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:53 am
by Cre8tivepixels
Thanks for checking these out.....juts got my new 17-35mm WOW so much sharper than that dud they call the 17-55mm..........i cant believe the difference!

Here are some i took yesterday......


Image

Image

Image

Image

Cheers
dan

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:12 am
by Laurie
Dan fantastic as always.
though the last one could of done with a higher f/stop as her bottom half is a little soft.
well done, and to be honest, i like seeing different models :D

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:18 am
by wendellt
very creative work especially like the mask concept
as a whole image i think the 3rd one works best

the 17-35 is the best

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:38 am
by Cre8tivepixels
wendellt wrote:the 17-35 is the best


You bet it is....the whole reason i got it was after seeing your images and hoping (wrongly i might add) :wink: that i could take images like you....BUT i was really surprised just how much sharper it was, i don't know maybe i had a dud 17-55, i heard there were a few around....thanks for the comments!
Dan

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:19 pm
by wendellt
nah 17-35 is the best

somehow the 1.5 crop factor uses the best circle of the lens on the 17-35

something i read in a tech paper

loved it more than my 28-70

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:01 pm
by Oz_Beachside
nice shots. I didnt want to read this, as I sometimes find the 28-70 too close, and I like the perspective change closer to 17mm.

Nice as always Dan!

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 11:23 am
by marcotrov
Terrific work Dan. You are really using the qualities of 17-35 very well. I agree guys, I love my 17-35 it's a ripper. It also fit in nicely with my efforts to maintain full frame integrity, or at least give me that option if ever Nikon decide to go that way, not that i see anything wrong with the DX alternative :) But it's good to have the optional choice. So I have 12-24 F/4 (the only DX lens in my arsenal), 17-35, 35-70 F/2.8, 70-200VR, 80-400VR.
I do notice however that the 17-35 can be unforgiving on poor technique, certainly in combination with the high res of the D200.
cheers
marco

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 12:27 pm
by Nnnnsic
Good compositions, but one of these days you're going to have to learn not to lose your shadows and your highlights to all buggery.

Shall we demonstrate?

Number 1 has her hair fading into each part. It doesn't take much PP work to bring that out. I'm going to assume you don't know how or that you're not very good at post but all it takes is a bit of patience, feathering, and curves Dan.

Number 2... there go those highlights again. I can assume her right breast (left to us) isn't supposed to be radiating light?

Number 3... so her black bra is made out of the darkest, most evil, and stealthiest technology known to man kind... not if you look at the straps it ain't.

Number 4 is your best. I have nothing to say about it colour wise, but I'd stop making your models lose so much skin composition. They seem plasticy.

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 1:38 pm
by Cre8tivepixels
Thanks guys for the feedback..... :)